UAP national director Craig Kelly catches out the Bureau of Meteorology: BoM says it excluded the result as it was recorded with non-standard equipment and can't be validated
The BOM has been taken over by Climate Change Activists. Craig Kelly has shown this a few times now.
The older generation of actual professional Meteorologists have slowly been driven out or retired out.
The result is this woke version of BOM, that never gets long range forecasts right, waffles on about heat waves, and produces error prone reports that are easily fact checked.
I remember reading stories of terrible flooding events in the 1800's and early 1900's in various parts of NSW. The described waters rising over house roofs. These days, every flood is "unprecedented", or historic or some such Climate change rubbish. Nup, every flood is just normal, people need to plan for their eventual arrival.
Yes totally: floods and fires are normal in Australia and so are droughts and heatwaves, and we just have to plan for them. Don't build your house on a river or a floodplain, is a good start. I found it fascinating that in 1939 so many people just dropped dead of the heat. I had never thought about that. Conditions were so tough back then: no air conditioning, many had no refrigerators - no way to cool down. They just died of the heat. We should respect these people for their toughness in building a nation in such harsh conditions. These days the people complain - but you don't hear of 60 people dropping dead of the heat over a couple of days anymore.
:D Their long range forecasts are shocking at the moment. But doesn't it do great rhetorical things to continually announce 'hottest and driest summers ever'?
And on the woke, yes, actively and directly advertising for all the gender fluid possibilities.
They also replaced their meteorologist communicators with non-meteorologist communicators, because they'd hate a real meteorologist saying "yeah, it's not that bad". Now they have a barrier and the communicator is limited to the controlled message because they don't have the qualification to say 'yeah nah'.
I suspect BOM will reply that they back-reduced all the temperatures recorded by specific methods - something related to the housing of the thermometers. I watched them do this reduction in real time, because at one point I'd ordered a lot of historical data, subsequently seeing temperatures being reduced later. I spoke with a meteorologist friend and had no reason to discredit the academic intent at the time, but I keep it in mind.
I agree that the energy of the young is being distracted away from very important issues. They are being tied up with the thrill of gender fluidity mixed with climate fear.
This happened back in the early 2000s. We'd have to expect they'd done some solid comparative analysis between new equipment and old before changing historical temperatures for the purpose of time series consistency. That said, a single temperature shouldn't be used as a single rhetorical surrogate for a climate idea.
Yeah...its called P-Hacking...There was no analysis between new and old equipment. Activists and Govt staff who know what answers their bosses want manipulate the data to fit in line with the consensus CAGW hypothesis.
Such high termeratures are of academic interest only because specific locations can be effected by a whole host of contextually-unique conditions converging, such as damage to the ozone layer from distant volcanic activity, cessation of wind, absence of cloud, high aridity, topography, and many more factors not extant anywhere else in the region, state, or nation.
However, what is worth taking notice of is a heat wave effecting an entire region and this can have climatic significance if repeated enough times. Scientists have long been influenced by the politics of the day, but not so dairy farmers, who are endemically insular, financially objective, and meticulous in their recoroding, which they compare regularly with their neighbours, freinds and family,
Thus it was in 1934, that NSW dairy farmers recorded this as their hottest ever year. This record was reiterated in the Narooma News letters colomn in, as I recall, 1999, but not to correct the records but of conversational interest by a famer seeking other records to correct another date lost in a document fire. Incidantal to this publication, I was viisiting family in the region, I contacted a friend at NASA who said their secret (not to be seen by politicians or military) records also showed 1934 to be the hottest year on record.
The moral of this story is that community values and intrinsic interest can only be guarded by the community itself, noy by purported representatives. A salient lesson of history is that representatives never represent the people who appointed or elected them, but they faithfully represent those who further their career interests and income. And yet we plod year on year down this representation road, beliving the myth propagated by globalists that representationalism and democracy are the same thing. They are not. Abe Lincoln said it best... "Government of the people, by the people and for the people". His lyrical success contributed to his death.
If we want a change to policy, hold a referendum. No representatives in involved. No crooked politicians, no pompous governor-general, no psychopathic Prime Ministers. Just direct democracy; each individual determinining his own future in concord with his fellow Australians.
The elitsts and hierarchists howl that nobody can ever agree but surveys show that when people have access to the same valid information they all (97%) form the same conclusion, bcause they all have the same basic values... they just want their families happy and prosperous.
Such ordinary people would conclude, "Global warming? Rising seas? Are you mad?"
The BOM has been taken over by Climate Change Activists. Craig Kelly has shown this a few times now.
The older generation of actual professional Meteorologists have slowly been driven out or retired out.
The result is this woke version of BOM, that never gets long range forecasts right, waffles on about heat waves, and produces error prone reports that are easily fact checked.
I remember reading stories of terrible flooding events in the 1800's and early 1900's in various parts of NSW. The described waters rising over house roofs. These days, every flood is "unprecedented", or historic or some such Climate change rubbish. Nup, every flood is just normal, people need to plan for their eventual arrival.
Yes totally: floods and fires are normal in Australia and so are droughts and heatwaves, and we just have to plan for them. Don't build your house on a river or a floodplain, is a good start. I found it fascinating that in 1939 so many people just dropped dead of the heat. I had never thought about that. Conditions were so tough back then: no air conditioning, many had no refrigerators - no way to cool down. They just died of the heat. We should respect these people for their toughness in building a nation in such harsh conditions. These days the people complain - but you don't hear of 60 people dropping dead of the heat over a couple of days anymore.
:D Their long range forecasts are shocking at the moment. But doesn't it do great rhetorical things to continually announce 'hottest and driest summers ever'?
And on the woke, yes, actively and directly advertising for all the gender fluid possibilities.
They also replaced their meteorologist communicators with non-meteorologist communicators, because they'd hate a real meteorologist saying "yeah, it's not that bad". Now they have a barrier and the communicator is limited to the controlled message because they don't have the qualification to say 'yeah nah'.
I suspect BOM will reply that they back-reduced all the temperatures recorded by specific methods - something related to the housing of the thermometers. I watched them do this reduction in real time, because at one point I'd ordered a lot of historical data, subsequently seeing temperatures being reduced later. I spoke with a meteorologist friend and had no reason to discredit the academic intent at the time, but I keep it in mind.
I agree that the energy of the young is being distracted away from very important issues. They are being tied up with the thrill of gender fluidity mixed with climate fear.
Yeah..they will say the temperature has been given the Orwellian green wash and "smoothed" / "adjusted"/ "homogenized" to fit worlds best practices ..
This happened back in the early 2000s. We'd have to expect they'd done some solid comparative analysis between new equipment and old before changing historical temperatures for the purpose of time series consistency. That said, a single temperature shouldn't be used as a single rhetorical surrogate for a climate idea.
Yeah...its called P-Hacking...There was no analysis between new and old equipment. Activists and Govt staff who know what answers their bosses want manipulate the data to fit in line with the consensus CAGW hypothesis.
Its called Noble Cause Corruption...
Maybe :) But I personally knew the meteorologist I talked with about it.
Applying old-school values, they are mad.
good proposition Madeleine. I just hope they reply at all. Very interesting insight you have thank you for sharing it.
Such high termeratures are of academic interest only because specific locations can be effected by a whole host of contextually-unique conditions converging, such as damage to the ozone layer from distant volcanic activity, cessation of wind, absence of cloud, high aridity, topography, and many more factors not extant anywhere else in the region, state, or nation.
However, what is worth taking notice of is a heat wave effecting an entire region and this can have climatic significance if repeated enough times. Scientists have long been influenced by the politics of the day, but not so dairy farmers, who are endemically insular, financially objective, and meticulous in their recoroding, which they compare regularly with their neighbours, freinds and family,
Thus it was in 1934, that NSW dairy farmers recorded this as their hottest ever year. This record was reiterated in the Narooma News letters colomn in, as I recall, 1999, but not to correct the records but of conversational interest by a famer seeking other records to correct another date lost in a document fire. Incidantal to this publication, I was viisiting family in the region, I contacted a friend at NASA who said their secret (not to be seen by politicians or military) records also showed 1934 to be the hottest year on record.
The moral of this story is that community values and intrinsic interest can only be guarded by the community itself, noy by purported representatives. A salient lesson of history is that representatives never represent the people who appointed or elected them, but they faithfully represent those who further their career interests and income. And yet we plod year on year down this representation road, beliving the myth propagated by globalists that representationalism and democracy are the same thing. They are not. Abe Lincoln said it best... "Government of the people, by the people and for the people". His lyrical success contributed to his death.
If we want a change to policy, hold a referendum. No representatives in involved. No crooked politicians, no pompous governor-general, no psychopathic Prime Ministers. Just direct democracy; each individual determinining his own future in concord with his fellow Australians.
The elitsts and hierarchists howl that nobody can ever agree but surveys show that when people have access to the same valid information they all (97%) form the same conclusion, bcause they all have the same basic values... they just want their families happy and prosperous.
Such ordinary people would conclude, "Global warming? Rising seas? Are you mad?"
🤢of the climate hoax, just another fear campaign taking us a step closer to losing our freedoms😔