I'd like these questions answered, too, but it would seem that, as in the U.S., these individuals and their departments are protected by all-encompassing and impenetrable sovereign immunity.
As I see it, sovereign immunity protects lazy or incompetent or partisan or corrupt individuals in civil servant positions, particularly in the judiciary.
I'm curious about compulsory voting in Australia. Do you have the option to write in an alternative candidate of your choice, as we do in the U.S.? How is compliance policed for the entire population? Are there exemptions for the clearly intellectually incompetent to vote? (I'll websearch the answers but please comment if you'd like to.)
Kathleen – this may answer a couple of your questions about how things work in Australia compared to the U.S. –
Q1: “I'm curious about compulsory voting in Australia. Do you have the option to write in an alternative candidate of your choice, as we do in the U.S.?” -
A1: There is no option to write in an alternative political candidate on ballot papers - although amusingly, when I undertook scrutineer duties at a particular polling station for a local government election about eight years ago, some of the voters had written ‘Trump’ on their ballot papers, which of course made their votes invalid. They were just frustrated about the Tweedledum-Tweedledee party system that we have here in Australia. Unlike the U.S. system, no matter which party is elected, you still get the same bureaucrats administering the government apparatus – people who are generally experts in bamboozling the (often pretty dumb) government ministers who are supposed to be the decision-makers. It is called the “Yes, Minister syndrome” – referring to the BBC TV series of fame from the 1970s.
Q2: “How is compliance policed for the entire population? Are there exemptions for the clearly intellectually incompetent to vote?”
A2: Compliance with the compulsory voting requirement appears to be very haphazard. In the case of an individual who is identified as not voting, the fine is fairly trivial – the exact amount depends on whether it is a state or federal election. The fine for the feds is about AUD$20, but for the states it could be up to $160 if they don’t pay up immediately. Secondly – yes, there are a range of exemptions for people who may not be able to get to the polls or may be intellectually disadvantaged. It is not hard to avoid voting.
You are correct that “sovereign immunity protects lazy or incompetent or partisan or corrupt individuals in civil servant positions” – that is the way the real government (the unelected bureaucracy) has built the system over the last 230 odd years of the existence of Australia as a political entity in the Western tradition.
Here is something that you may not be aware of – despite many superficial similarities with the United States, the psychology of Australians and Australian behavioural attributes are radically different to those of the U.S. There are no constitutional provisions for free speech in Australia, nor freedom of religion for that matter. The Australian Constitution was largely a mechanical device to facilitate the federation of the original six British colonies on the Australian land mass. It was not meant to be a legal device to enshrine rights, etc. There is a federal Human Rights Commission – a divisive and highly politicised body - but that disgracefully proved itself to be a fraud during the Covid crisis and the mandatory jabbing - about which it remained silent. It should be abolished. Much of the real political power resides with the states, which can rejig their own state constitutions at the drop of a hat simply by a vote in their parliaments.
Although Australians have many admirable features, without doubt Australia is an extremely over governed country. Why? Because Australia has never been able to overcome the overbearing and over-governed culture of its beginnings as a penal colony of Britain. The late Andrew Breitbart’s statement that “Politics is downstream of culture” has never been truer than in Australia. The governing classes and general populace of Australia have never been able to disengage the embedded thought processes of the colonial police state of two centuries ago – in which the Government and the public officials who pulled its levers of power had total authority over the benighted citizenry.
There needs to be a complete overhaul of the Federal and State constitutions of Australia to redress this imbalance of power and to put obstructive public officials in their proper place – but by the time that happens, I will be long gone.
Hi, Lapun Ozymandias — I just reread your much appreciated reply and noticed to my regret that I never thanked you for your informative response and the time you took to write it. Glad I had the opportunity to do so now. Thanks very much!
Of course they can’t be given absolute immunity if they deliberately and knowingly committed a crime, but it’s all “smoke and mirrors”… That’s why they’re now arguing they never owed a duty of care! It’s being used in courtrooms all over the country from child protection to adult guardianship.
Yes. A judge could be arrested and tried for killing his wife but not for destroying a child's life by awarding custody to an abusive parent who eventually kills the child. Nor for ordering forced covid vaccination, it appears.
The immunity only applies w/r/t the government employee's on-the-job duties.
Thank you for the informative link. It seems possible to outwardly appear to fulfill the duty to vote by legally obtaining a paper ballot and submitting it blank, since a truly secret ballot could not be linked to a specific voter.
It would be impossible for me to be coerced to select someone I don't approve of and do not wish to represent me.
With respect to sovereign immunity, as I understand it, in contrast to a pre-emptive pardon, for example, the immunity does not consider guilt or innocence but merely protects the government or its representative from being sued.
“…the overall costs of the case… if it proceeds to a final judgement are likely to be in the order of tens, if not hundreds, of millions of dollars”.
Justice Katzmann has done us all a favour by pointing out what the plaintiff’s lawyers should have known and advised in the first place.
The barriers to obtaining evidentiary information from the bureaucracy & government ministers and the protections against liability that have been erected over time to shield them are formidable – and unlikely to be breached. (Remember, Australia was started as a penal colony, and the ethos of total government control that went with that has never been revoked). When combined with the fact that the bureaucracy also has unlimited access to taxpayers' funds to defend themselves, then the matter of liability and compensation for the injury caused by the population-wide application of the mRNA genetic injectables can only be resolved politically - and not through the court system.
In short, political action is the only real way forward. It can be done, but it may take decades (beyond my lifetime) – but the average Australian will need to be woken up as to how poorly we are served by our political and governance systems. Amongst other things, the Australian constitution doesn’t even give us the explicit right to free speech, let alone religious belief, as it was framed in an era when it was assumed that ‘British justice’ would go on forever.
Long term political action to redress embedded wrongs has worked in other Western countries, but it will need both commitment and organisation to bring it about, and it will require the average Australian to wake up and forgo the traditional “she’ll be right mate” frame of mind. That belonged to another era and was finally killed by the toxicity of the mRNA genetic injectables, which have without doubt degraded the long-term health outcomes of everyone who was injected. Don’t expect our equally degraded corporate & government media to take up this challenge – they don’t owe their allegiance to ordinary Australians.
In the short-term there is the distressing matter of Dr McCann’s financial situation. That needs to be addressed. Everyone who cares about this matter needs to put their hand in their pockets.
In the meantime, be assured that there is a way forward, but it will take time and active political commitment by ordinary Australians to change a rotten system.
I haven’t seen the Statement of Claim, Elizabeth, so I can’t answer your question. However, since the start of the Covid crisis, I have assumed that there is nothing enshrined in Australian law that explicitly gives us the right to ‘Informed Consent’. In other words, the Nuremberg Code was never incorporated into Australian law - possibly because in the post-WW2 victory euphoria it seemed to be just common sense and nobody gave a second thought to formalising the Code - until the manufactured Covid crisis was thrust upon us. I did read on someone’s Substack recently that at least one state in Australia has legislated that that state now has the power to force a person to accept medical treatment - namely an injectable substance. I think it was Western Australia. In other words, they have done the very opposite that the Nuremberg Code intended by legislating to impose a fascist requirement of the German Third Reich. Is there anybody reading this who can provide further detail as to how and when this Australian state did this? It needs to be blazoned across every billboard in the country.
Lapun Ozymandias...I feel like I'm screaming into an abyss...
In a 'free country' obviously it is presumed people have full autonomy over their own body...
So are we not living in a 'free country'?
As I have now shared many, many, many, MANY times...
The Australian Government confirmed in a letter to my colleague Emma McArthur, in December 2021: "...informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations."
Is there anything that is not clear about that sentence? What do you think it means? Is there any ambiguity?
Also, the same letter confirms that vaccinating practitioners DO NOT have specific liability protection for administering the COVID-19 injections, only a vaccine claims scheme was put in place, and that is not the same as giving vaccinating practitioners blanket protection.
The letter also refers to The Australian Immunisation Handbook, saying it "has information about 'valid consent', including criteria for consent to be legally valid". Looking at The Australian Immunisation Handbook, this information includes the key points: "For consent to be legally valid, the following elements must be present:... It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation... It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options have been explained to the person."
What do you think Lapun O, is that not clear?
Seriously!!!
I have been banging on about this now for LITERALLY YEARS!
I've brought it to the attention of the medical colleges such as the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians; plus the Australian Medical Association, and the Australian Medical Professionals' Society; and medical insurers, and AHPRA, and the prime minister and health minister and attorney general, and other politicians, and the chief medical officer, and other bureaucrats. Plus it's been provided to a variety of doctors in the community.
And here we are, still none of these people paying a blind bit of notice or addressing the travesty of mandatory vaccination being imposed across the community.
Emma received her letter from the government in December 2021...at the very same time vaccine mandates were in place!!!! And yet it's impossible to obtain 'valid consent' from someone who is under duress to submit to a medical intervention, e.g. they are under threat of losing their job and/or participation in society.
Literally years this has been going on, and no-one will address it...
I also have a similar letter from the Australian Government dated 17 November 2022.
The judge has no confidence ....spare me ....after 5 years of the bureacratic lies , the blatant corruption and malfeasance , the government's continuing to turn away from every single fact or piece of science that might incrimminate them or their public servant cronies....it's we the public , that have no confidence .....for those expecting to find justice in this system ....forget it ....this is a global problem and it's way bigger than most can comprehend ....!🙏
Excellent work. Sad subject. Frustrating in the extreme, the whole damn thing. So more than likely all the perpetrators and the guilty will get away with what in my view was outrageous misconduct, while our elected representatives look the other way.
A MILITARY attack against civilians conducted under emergency MILITARY powers at a time when the civilian constitution and all civilian law is SUSPENDED, can never (ever ever ever) be prosecuted in a civilian court.
There is a reason Nuremberg was a MILITARY tribunal!
I hope someone launches a Criminal Negligence trial based on the fact that Australians knew all the early warning signals and planned for AstraZeneca "expected deaths" in a conspiracy between the Australian Bureau of Statistics and the WHO.
Criminal Negligence DOESN'T EXIST when ALL civilian law is suspended (chief amongst it the constitution) and everything is done under "emergency powers" which literally allow ANYTHING to be done.
There is no legal remedy possible under the civilian legal system. Only MILITARY tribunals for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
"MILITARY" is the only term to talk about. Anything else is a distraction and misdirection.
Australia was under MARTIAL LAW (and still is when it comes to "public health"). The civilian legal system simply does not apply!
There is NO case to answer because EVERYTHING that was done (mandates, lockdowns, border closures) was PERFECTLY LEGAL under "emergency powers" which are STILL in place to this day!
The (civilian) constitution does not apply as it was lawfully SUSPENDED following the "state of emergency" declaration by the Governor-General (the highest authority across the entirety of all states and territories of the Commonwealth of Australia) which gave the federal health minister and the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) of the Commonwealth of Australia effectively UNLIMITED powers:
The MILITARY (Australian and other) is in-charge. They are not under the jurisdiction of ANY civilian court. ONLY military courts and international tribunals.
"On 18 March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 outbreak in Australia, the Governor-General declared that a human biosecurity emergency exists. The declaration gives the Minister for Health expansive powers to issue directions and set requirements in order to combat the outbreak. This is the first time these powers under the Biosecurity Act have been used…
The Minister’s powers under sections 477 and 478 of the Biosecurity Act are expansive. The powers may be used to do the following:
• set requirements to regulate or restrict the movement of persons, goods, or conveyances
• require that places be evacuated
• make directions to close premises.
The powers are not limited to these circumstances. Under the Biosecurity Act, provided that the Minister is satisfied that an action is necessary to either combat the listed human disease (in this case, COVID-19) or to implement WHO recommendations in relation to that disease, the Minister may make a direction or set a requirement to ensure that action takes place.
However, the Minister may not impose certain biosecurity obligations on an individual, such as requiring them to undergo a medical examination, requiring body samples for diagnosis, or requiring them to receive specified treatment or medication. Such measures can only be authorised under a human biosecurity control order, made by the Commonwealth Chief Medical Officer or a biosecurity officer in relation to a person who may have a listed human disease (including COVID-19).
The Commonwealth CMO may make members of the Australian Defence Force human biosecurity officers if satisfied that they have appropriate clinical expertise (section 563).
The Commonwealth CMO is required to determine, in writing, training and qualification requirements for human biosecurity officers.
Such officers can exercise various powers under the Biosecurity Act, including the making of human biosecurity control orders."
There is NO case to answer because EVERYTHING that was done (mandates, lockdowns, border closures) was PERFECTLY LEGAL under "emergency powers" which are STILL in place to this day!
END OF QUOTE
Can you please provide the specific evidence that mandates were "PERFECTLY LEGAL under "emergency powers" which are STILL in place to this day!"
Specifically, please provide me with the evidence that the vaccinators are protected from liability if they failed to obtain valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination.
Will do some digging for the specific receipts Elizabeth but generally speaking the injectables were under EUA (Emergency Use Authorisation) and were administered under EMERGENCY powers.
As such, these are NOT "vaccines" and thus NO informed consent is required. This was also the case in the US where the injectables were tested as "medical countermeasures" under the hospices of DoD and DARPA (which funded Moderna directly for years - https://x.com/DARPA/status/819556371213484032).
Again, NO informed consent is required as these are NOT "vaccines". This was just the 'advertising buzzword' used for the public.
I think in the case of Australia specifically, this is a very good starting point:
I only liked it because it gave an almost plausible reason for killing & maiming hundreds of thousands of Australians..
I don’t need to hear the word ‘military ,,military...used for what took place where I live - Australia
So ...better get it worked out cos ...there will be an RC HERE .....( we have had 2 proposals for them in 2-3 years
One by Katie Galagher & the labor party .. then the 2024 version - scuttled by the other side of the duopoly- Albo
So.... just give me the news for my country, AUSTRALIA! I’ll soon get it to 8million voters, plus
I live in Australia- the Australian body politic made the decisions that maimed and killed Melissa McCanns patients - no one else
So ... you Americans can have your warp speed to oblivion , every year if you want it
I want a judicial system here in my country that protects me , my kids & grandkids , from the obscene over reach by AUSTRALIAN ‘ so called ‘ political services- that regulate those bodies that we know were infiltrated -
The TGA. ATAGI and the lacking of those regulations resulting in killing hundreds of thousands of our citizens .
Fullstop
We have a Federal election in 22 days time - the 2 x times RC are now in the bin , with this case also, now,
NO REFLECTION upon the very brave and heroic efforts of Dr . Melissa Mc Cann --
For me the judge in this case continued to,prove to, that the their arrogant, aloof & preposterous mantle that these pseudo public servants reside in , thereby consuming large portions of our taxes , are increasingly USELESS.
Bring on Nuremberg 2.0 ; I am a long term supporter of it ; They can hang Fauci, Gates & whomever developed this scandalous means to kill world populations ...
But I want justice for the ‘ wilful acts of those local ‘ buffoons who sought to deceive , when they so easily ran off to Queensland to form their ‘ National Cabinet ‘ ; we know it - they, and the judiciary are ‘ in on it ‘, and I want it exposed.
Les Kraft, is Les Catterwell , & Les Katt,....
Well done Melissa , Alison & your team - it’s NOT OVER yet --- the punishment of our politicians mentioned has only just begun .....
Sorry - I understand that in the US it was a military operation, but was it a military operation here? The real problem as I understand it is to get a misfeasance claim off the ground, the plaintiffs need to plead who in Australia authorised the shots - and then need to show that that individual knew either shots not safe & effective or reckless indifference - very hard to work out who did the authorising - anyone know?
To prove misfeasance by Skerritt, Kelly and Hunt, the applicants would have to show they either acted outside their powers, intended to cause harm or were recklessly indifferent to the likely risk of harm - it’s not enough just to have a reasonably forseeable risk of harm, the judgement said.
END OF QUOTE
Did the lawsuit address the violation of valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination, e.g. via the implementation of widespread COVID-19 vaccination mandates?
The thing is Skerritt, Kelly and Hunt didn't personally mandate the vaccines (except maybe Hunt for aged care staff). The mandates came from the State Premiers and business CEOs. The Federal government could have objected to them though (but I guess they were "recklessly indifferent"!)
I will add more, but this to begin with: I found the original VAERS report troubling, as I am sure you did too and although I'm probably regurgitating what you already know, these numbers are set in stone from the first release of the vaccines and as I understand them, for the first 6 months from their release, not only in America, but for the rest of the world as well, in a continuing spiral of injuries and deaths and now, everyone vaccinated is a Genetically Modified Trans Human with zero Human Rights according to the US Supreme Court Law of 2013, also included - I have not worked out the actual numbers involved with your predetermination that those numbers should be multiplied by 41 (x41): Contracts let to record 1,000 deaths per day in VAERS - BEFORE - vaccines were available, or released into human arms - like "How was that possible" You tell me? Contracts wording provided and with who https://christine257.substack.com/p/why-would-trump-and-then-biden-destroy The Vaccine Inside the Race to Conquer the COVID-19 Pandemic by Joe Miller (Author), Özlem Türeci (Author), Ugur Sahin (Author) - in this book, Ugur Sahin describes his vaccines as "Gene Therapy Injections" and he says they target "The Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes" and don't cure Covid at all - but why, I have absolutely no idea. BioNTech CEO Ugur Sahin says that his mRNA vaccines rolled out in January this year (2021): Link here: https://www.ibtimes.sg/fact-check-biontech-ceo-ugur-sahin-refuses-take-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-due-safety-concerns-61652 but by August 27, 2020 – The first contract, with General Dynamics, is dated August 27, 2020 had been let and the contract states that they were expecting up to 1,000 VAERS reports to be filed per day https://christine257.substack.com/p/there-were-no-covid-19-vaccines-close CDC Expected Huge Increase in VAERS Reporting of vaccines injuries and deaths. The contract states that they were expecting up to 1,000 VAERS reports to be filed per day, with up to 40% of the reports being serious in nature: According to the contract, VAERS had been receiving an annual average of 53,000 reports in recent years, so in contracting for up to 1,000 reports per day, the CDC was already anticipating that the COVID vaccines might generate nearly seven times as many reports as all other vaccines combined (a 600% increase), with a rate of serious adverse events that could be up to 8 times higher. The initial total amount specified (with options) under the contract with Eagle Health Analytics was $5,925,388.58 or $7,077,054.90 “with all options” (which presumably includes the extension of the VAERS work through July). This amount also includes the CISA project assistance. However, it does not include the increased hours in the Oct. 29 revision, nor the increase for the V-SAFE pregnancy registry work. However, I have not been able to find the contract in any Federal contracts database. Perhaps one of my readers will have better luck. How Much Did All of This Cost? The amounts paid out under the contracts with General Dynamics were redacted. But according to this site, the initial amount paid was $9.45 million, with $4.4 million added in late February, and then an additional $16.3 million tacked on in early March. In March of 2022 there was an additional $5.2 million added, though it’s not clear for what since the contract had presumably expired by then. (Best guess is that General Dynamics continued some or all of its work on COVID VAERS reports with Eagle Health brought in for additional support.) Grand total? $35,425,642 of your taxpayer dollars.Military Revealed as Top Funder of Gene Drives; Gates Foundation paid $1.6 million to influence UN on gene drives 2016 December 4, 2017 https://christine257.substack.com/p/there-were-no-covid-19-vaccines-close?utm_source=%2Fsearch%2Fgeneral%2520dynamics&utm_medium=reader2 According to my mathematics - all in the first 6 months, from the Covid vaccines injections and some clever mathmetician said that to get current numbers the VAERS reported numbers, had to be multiplied by 41 (x41) to get current vaccines damages correct numbers. As above - do you think the covid vaccines were safe? It was Jessica Rose that came up with the number 41. https://secularheretic.substack.com/p/death-by-covid-jabs-update-12 WASHINGTON, D.C. — Over 1,200 emails released under open records requests reveal that the U.S. military is now the top funder and influencer behind a controversial genetic extinction technology known as “gene drives” – pumping $100 million into the field. The trove of emails, obtained via open records requests, also shed light on a $1.6 million dollar UN gene drive advocacy operation paid for by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. https://christine257.substack.com/p/military-revealed-as-top-funder-of Dr. Peter Kotlár, a Slovak physician, government commissioner, and MP drops bombshell investigation into DNA Contamination. The vaccinated are now officially GMO!! "I’m not afraid to say officially— a genetically modified organism. " Robert Kennedy Jr, Pam Bondi and Kash Patel has also been informed. Moderna's Covid-19 virus formula Patented 2013 - #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG The US Supreme Court 2013 ruled that only cDNA (Synthetic DNA) is patentable. Isolated, natural DNA is not patentable, but in a nutshell, biotechnology companies can own living things if said things are genetically-modified and not naturally occurring - that means that The Department Of Defense (and others) can literally own a human being if this synthetic code is taken up into your Genome, which a Swedish Company observed to occur within 6 hours from Covid-19 Gene Therapy "vaccines" Injections. Dr Madej wrote The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your "genetic code" making you genetically modified, but Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that 1) The shots change your genetic code. 2) The shots do not stop the spread of Covid-19. 3) Tal Zaks says the Moderna shot is "hacking the software of life" and that Carbon Particles and Viral Vectors do the same thing. A vaccinated person is now legally, a "Trans Human" - A Trans Human is a new species which never existed before and by Law, they have Zero Human rights, because they are no longer Human and thus, because no Rights have ever been written into Law for them, they now have Zero rights - but much like the American Slaves up to 1865, when President Lincoln wrote into Law, Rights for them. Gene Therapy is not reversable, but now described as a forced medical treatment, which Biontech/Pfizer said "should have been licensed as a Gene Therapy Injection (2015)" and which "Targets the Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes (2023)" - but why? Thomas Renz, Lawyer, identified the vaccines as being ModRNA and not mRNA Dr Francis Boyle, the Harvard educated Law Professor who drafted the Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act of 1989, provided an Affidavit that Covid-19 mRNA injections are Biological Weapons and Weapons of Mass Destruction. Dr Boyle stated that the Covid-19 injections violate Biological Weapons 18 USC 175 and Weapons and Firearms 790.166 Fla. Stat (2023). The Expose, back in 2019 published that DARPA Scientists were bragging on Twitter that they had made the Covid-19 virus with Moderna - which Moderna went on to Patent in 2013: From that patent for Moderna's Covid-19 virus: #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
As above - the biggest problems that I see is that no Laws have been broken and everyone volunteered to be vaccinated and the Law is specific on that point, when you volunteer to do something, you are legally liable for whatever the result of that voluntary decision might be, however: The “Vaccines” Do Not Contain messenger RNA They Contain modified RNA and Micro RNA
“It is my opinion that, at a minimum, the intentional use of mRNA—an acronym well-known to stand for messenger RNA along with the endless statements about the vaccines being based on naturally occurring messenger RNA constitute misbranding in violation of a number of laws. There is a legal and moral duty to provide informed consent, and to misrepresent a drug that was intended to be a gene therapy as a vaccine containing “natural messenger RNA” is an apparent violation of both of those duties.” Thomas Renz (Ohio-based attorney)
Vials of the COVID-19 vaccine are seen at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Md., Dec. 14, 2020.
Lawyer Tom Renz has exposed that the COVID-19 vaccines, widely advertised as mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines, are in fact lab-created hybrids known as modRNA.
BREAKING – UK Medicine Regulator confirms COVID-19 is Man-made & the Vaccines were created using Computer Generated DNA By The Exposé on October 30, 2022
U.S. Government Data Reveals a Staggering 143,233% Surge in Fatal Cancer Cases Linked to COVID Vaccinations
By The Exposé on December 8, 2023
Cancer begins when genetic changes interfere with the normal replication and replacement of cells in the body. Cells start to grow uncontrollably and may form a tumour. It is the No. 2 leading cause of death in the United States.
However - Ivermectin Tablets for all Cancers recommended by Mel Gibson, they clear up Cancers and make them go away in most cases including aggressive turbo cancers - should get them from your local Vet.
This probably does not help, but it is how it is: Dr. Peter Kotlár, a Slovak physician, government commissioner, and MP drops bombshell investigation into DNA Contamination. The vaccinated are now officially GMO!!
"I’m not afraid to say officially— a genetically modified organism.
" Robert Kennedy Jr, Pam Bondi and Kash Patel has also been informed.
Moderna's Covid-19 virus formula Patented 2013 - #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
The US Supreme Court 2013 ruled that only cDNA (Synthetic DNA) is patentable. Isolated, natural DNA is not patentable, but in a nutshell, biotechnology companies can own living things if said things are genetically-modified and not naturally occurring - that means that The Department Of Defense (and others) can literally own a human being if this synthetic code is taken up into your Genome, which a Swedish Company observed to occur within 6 hours from Covid-19 Gene Therapy "vaccines" Injections.
Dr Madej wrote The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your "genetic code" making you genetically modified, but Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that 1) The shots change your genetic code. 2) The shots do not stop the spread of Covid-19. 3) Tal Zaks says the Moderna shot is "hacking the software of life" and that Carbon Particles and Viral Vectors do the same thing. A vaccinated person is now legally, a "Trans Human" -
A Trans Human is a new species which never existed before and by Law, they have Zero Human rights, because they are no longer Human and thus, because no Rights have ever been written into Law for them, they now have Zero rights - but much like the American Slaves up to 1865, when President Lincoln wrote into Law, Rights for them.
Gene Therapy is not reversable, but now described as a forced medical treatment, which Biontech/Pfizer said "should have been licensed as a Gene Therapy Injection (2015)" and which "Targets the Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes (2023)" - but why?
Thomas Renz, Lawyer, identified the vaccines as being ModRNA and not mRNA
Dr Francis Boyle, the Harvard educated Law Professor who drafted the Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act of 1989, provided an Affidavit that Covid-19 mRNA injections are Biological Weapons and Weapons of Mass Destruction.
Dr Boyle stated that the Covid-19 injections violate Biological Weapons 18 USC 175 and Weapons and Firearms 790.166 Fla. Stat (2023).
The Expose, back in 2019 published that DARPA Scientists were bragging on Twitter that they had made the Covid-19 virus with Moderna - which Moderna went on to Patent in 2013: From that patent for Moderna's Covid-19 virus: #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
May 17 2024 (Reuters) - Moderna (MRNA.O) said on Friday the European Patent Office had upheld the validity of one of the company's key patents #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG , a win in an ongoing COVID-19 vaccine dispute with Pfizer (PFE.N) and BioNTech (22UAy.DE)
The company has been locked in a legal battle with Pfizer-BioNTech over their COVID shot Comirnaty after suing them in 2022 for allegedly copying its mRNA technology, but presumably #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG.
Pfizer and BioNTech have countersued, alleging that Moderna's patent is invalid, after the companies' rival vaccines generated billions in revenues during the pandemic.
Pfizer said it was disappointed and would consider all legal options and may appeal the decision.
"Irrespective of the outcome of this legal matter, we will continue to manufacture and supply the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine," Pfizer said in a statement to Reuters.
BioNTech said the patent office's decision to maintain Moderna's European patent #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG "does not change our unwavering and unequivocal stance that this patent is invalid."
Could Moderna have created their vaccine, or Biontech for Pfizer their vaccines, without the Moderna Key Patent #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG Covid-19 virus, Moderna patented in 2013, the same year that The US Supreme Court 2013 ruled that only cDNA (Synthetic DNA) is patentable?
Ugur Sahin Co-founder and CEO of BioNTech refuses to take the mRNA Covid vaccine because he says, “we need to ensure functionality of our whole company”
Ugur Sahin refuses to take the jab because he says he must ensure he stays "functional," in other words, he knows that the clot shot renders humans functionless, incapacitated, and seriously injured where they cannot do their job, take care of themselves, or function for their children anymore - or kill them.
Mandatory vaccination is illegal under Australian Law and would be subject to Legal Proceedings under Common Law against Section 51 of the Legal Code.
The Constitution prohibits any form of compulsion, which would subject citizens to medical or pharmaceutical services, including manadatory vaccination. They should remain free to decide whether they wish to receive certain medical treatments, including vaccination and they should not be disadvantaged by any government on the ground of their own voluntary decisions. - as an example of what should be standard everywhere.
The vaccines drive was a military operation. Trump in America released the Covid vaccines under his Operation Warp Speed, AUKUS released the vaccines for Australia, England and probably New Zealand and The World Health Organization released their vaccines for Europe, China had a version of Pfizer's vaccines which they released at the same time and Russia had its own vaccine which they released at the same time too. Biden sent freebies to countries which could not afford to buy them, so the Covid vaccines spread was deliberate and World Wide and all at roughly the same time - not just in your Australia and this is what started it - the Covid-19 virus Patent formula in 2013 which you can see Moderna owns - conveniently created at the same time roughly as The US Supreme Court Law above was passed: The Chinese made Covid-19 and released it on the World - Yes, Right - not one Chinese name on the patents for Moderna's Covid-19 virus in 2013
Basically it is irrefutable proof that Moderna created the Covid-19 virus and here are the Patents for it: ModernaGate: Moderna wins Award for Deadly Covid Vaccine it was able to create prior to 2019 because “Murderna” is responsible for creating the Covid-19 Virus in a BioLab… #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG By The Exposé on April 30, 2023
Moderna's Covid-19 virus #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG may evade vaccines or the protection of natural immunity. CDC
Moderna was part of the planning and implementation of covid-19, gain-of-function experimentation, and vaccine profiteering. Here are the patents:
US9149506B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding septin-4 – 2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc.
Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
US9216205B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding granulysin – 2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc.
US9255129B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding SIAH E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 – 2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc.
US9301993B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding apoptosis inducing factor 1 – 2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc.
US9587003B2: Modified polynucleotides for the production of oncology-related proteins and peptides – 2016-02-04 Application filed by ModernaTx Inc.
Inventor: Stephane Bancel, Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles, Sayda M. Elbashir, Matthias John, Atanu Roy, Susan Whoriskey, Kristy M. Wood, Paul Hatala, Jason P. Schrum, Kenechi Ejebe, Jeff Lynn Ellsworth, Justin Guild
Learn more about this bombshell SARS-CoV-2 laboratory origin evidence at The Expose.
"if" mRNA DNA, which is natural to all life forms and by US Supreme Court Law can't be Patented opens the door to Heaven - what door does the Synthetic made in a Laboratory Patented ModRNA DNA open after death? - a death none of us can escape?
I refused, but it was probably easier for me because I am on a pension and at the very bottom of the income bracket, where I don't matter any more - same age as Trump 78. So far, my pension has not been used as a means to control my refusal - but I'd rather die than be Covid vaccinated, because I want my mRNA spirit to go to Heaven and not to wherever the ModRNA DNA, made in a laboratory and synthetic unnatural DNA lot go after death. I live on the same planet as you, it is a big planet fortunately and getting emptier, post vaccines, daily now.
I took the reference to "fresh eyes and a fresh start" to raise the possibility that Justice Katzmann, who is no longer taking on new cases and wants to retire this year, might be hinting that another Federal Court judge takes it on?
It is not the vaccine injured’s fault if her honour Katzman is just plain DUMB and STUPID. So dumb she says she cannot understand the language in the brief. Well dummy, take a crash course on medical terminology and vaccine injuries, just like all of those who were injured had to do! WHYTF should they get their case thrown out when their lives are now ruined, because you really don’t have the intelligence required to hold the position you do? Step down and let a REAL JUDGE with actual intelligence try the case and while you are at it, make sure they are not woke, biased and left leaning like you obviously are.
HANG YOUR HEAD IN SHAME Katzman because while you are dicking around these poor injured people and the families of those who died, please realise people are still trusting this fraudulent medical system and lining up for more of these deadly and totally ineffective so called vaccines! AND THAT FRESH BLOOD WILL BE ON YOUR HANDS!!!
ANGRY BEYOND WORDS THAT THIS CASE WAS GIVEN TO AN INCOMPETENT!!!
The judgement was quite clear and logical, despite the compelling stories involved and obvious malfeasance by government and big pharma and media. The problem is you have a set of laws and a government bureaucracy designed to shield people from responsibility. Only political action can take it down and rebuild it.
To my mind, this goes to show that the TGA Act (1989) & all the other Acts since about 1986 (Australia Act), were designed to establish an administrative state & regulatory framework that i) protected industry/corporate interests & targeted competitors & ii) made a shield for them & the bureaucrats so they couldn't easily be held to account.
Given what we have seen with the other so called regulators, this seems obvious in hindsight.
From what I've witnessed, the legal teams for the plaintiffs in a variety of cases over the last 5 years, haven't been able to touch the intelligence of the Government Solicitors. Although I applaud all attempts trying to get some justice, consider why do the applicants have to have a 'statement of claim'? One who makes the claim has to prove it. The government were the ones who made claims re the 'safe & effective', why can't applicants challenge the logic & reasons behind those claims in a court of law? Have the laws been written or amendment to make such a thing virtually impossible? Like legal minds need to come together to really think everything through. And that goes for some contending our 'laws' are illegal or counterfeit & not based on the original Constitution.
Re “Skerritt, Hunt and Kelly are all “protected persons””
What does this mean? How and why are they ‘protected’?
I'd like these questions answered, too, but it would seem that, as in the U.S., these individuals and their departments are protected by all-encompassing and impenetrable sovereign immunity.
Are they protected?
We need the detail.
How can ‘we the people’ be thrown to the wolves like this by supposed ‘public servants’?
Our whole system of government is an unmitigated disaster - it is not serving the best interests of the people.
And in Australia we are compelled to vote for this shambles, we have ‘compulsory voting’ here…in a supposed ‘free country’…
As I see it, sovereign immunity protects lazy or incompetent or partisan or corrupt individuals in civil servant positions, particularly in the judiciary.
I'm curious about compulsory voting in Australia. Do you have the option to write in an alternative candidate of your choice, as we do in the U.S.? How is compliance policed for the entire population? Are there exemptions for the clearly intellectually incompetent to vote? (I'll websearch the answers but please comment if you'd like to.)
Kathleen – this may answer a couple of your questions about how things work in Australia compared to the U.S. –
Q1: “I'm curious about compulsory voting in Australia. Do you have the option to write in an alternative candidate of your choice, as we do in the U.S.?” -
A1: There is no option to write in an alternative political candidate on ballot papers - although amusingly, when I undertook scrutineer duties at a particular polling station for a local government election about eight years ago, some of the voters had written ‘Trump’ on their ballot papers, which of course made their votes invalid. They were just frustrated about the Tweedledum-Tweedledee party system that we have here in Australia. Unlike the U.S. system, no matter which party is elected, you still get the same bureaucrats administering the government apparatus – people who are generally experts in bamboozling the (often pretty dumb) government ministers who are supposed to be the decision-makers. It is called the “Yes, Minister syndrome” – referring to the BBC TV series of fame from the 1970s.
Q2: “How is compliance policed for the entire population? Are there exemptions for the clearly intellectually incompetent to vote?”
A2: Compliance with the compulsory voting requirement appears to be very haphazard. In the case of an individual who is identified as not voting, the fine is fairly trivial – the exact amount depends on whether it is a state or federal election. The fine for the feds is about AUD$20, but for the states it could be up to $160 if they don’t pay up immediately. Secondly – yes, there are a range of exemptions for people who may not be able to get to the polls or may be intellectually disadvantaged. It is not hard to avoid voting.
You are correct that “sovereign immunity protects lazy or incompetent or partisan or corrupt individuals in civil servant positions” – that is the way the real government (the unelected bureaucracy) has built the system over the last 230 odd years of the existence of Australia as a political entity in the Western tradition.
Here is something that you may not be aware of – despite many superficial similarities with the United States, the psychology of Australians and Australian behavioural attributes are radically different to those of the U.S. There are no constitutional provisions for free speech in Australia, nor freedom of religion for that matter. The Australian Constitution was largely a mechanical device to facilitate the federation of the original six British colonies on the Australian land mass. It was not meant to be a legal device to enshrine rights, etc. There is a federal Human Rights Commission – a divisive and highly politicised body - but that disgracefully proved itself to be a fraud during the Covid crisis and the mandatory jabbing - about which it remained silent. It should be abolished. Much of the real political power resides with the states, which can rejig their own state constitutions at the drop of a hat simply by a vote in their parliaments.
Although Australians have many admirable features, without doubt Australia is an extremely over governed country. Why? Because Australia has never been able to overcome the overbearing and over-governed culture of its beginnings as a penal colony of Britain. The late Andrew Breitbart’s statement that “Politics is downstream of culture” has never been truer than in Australia. The governing classes and general populace of Australia have never been able to disengage the embedded thought processes of the colonial police state of two centuries ago – in which the Government and the public officials who pulled its levers of power had total authority over the benighted citizenry.
There needs to be a complete overhaul of the Federal and State constitutions of Australia to redress this imbalance of power and to put obstructive public officials in their proper place – but by the time that happens, I will be long gone.
Hi, Lapun Ozymandias — I just reread your much appreciated reply and noticed to my regret that I never thanked you for your informative response and the time you took to write it. Glad I had the opportunity to do so now. Thanks very much!
But do they have immunity?
How can anyone be 'immune' if they have committed wrongdoing?
This must be clarified...
Re compulsory voting in Australia, see for example this link: https://www.aec.gov.au/about_aec/publications/voting/
Of course they can’t be given absolute immunity if they deliberately and knowingly committed a crime, but it’s all “smoke and mirrors”… That’s why they’re now arguing they never owed a duty of care! It’s being used in courtrooms all over the country from child protection to adult guardianship.
Yes. A judge could be arrested and tried for killing his wife but not for destroying a child's life by awarding custody to an abusive parent who eventually kills the child. Nor for ordering forced covid vaccination, it appears.
The immunity only applies w/r/t the government employee's on-the-job duties.
Thank you for the informative link. It seems possible to outwardly appear to fulfill the duty to vote by legally obtaining a paper ballot and submitting it blank, since a truly secret ballot could not be linked to a specific voter.
It would be impossible for me to be coerced to select someone I don't approve of and do not wish to represent me.
With respect to sovereign immunity, as I understand it, in contrast to a pre-emptive pardon, for example, the immunity does not consider guilt or innocence but merely protects the government or its representative from being sued.
Quoting Justice Katzmann:
“…the overall costs of the case… if it proceeds to a final judgement are likely to be in the order of tens, if not hundreds, of millions of dollars”.
Justice Katzmann has done us all a favour by pointing out what the plaintiff’s lawyers should have known and advised in the first place.
The barriers to obtaining evidentiary information from the bureaucracy & government ministers and the protections against liability that have been erected over time to shield them are formidable – and unlikely to be breached. (Remember, Australia was started as a penal colony, and the ethos of total government control that went with that has never been revoked). When combined with the fact that the bureaucracy also has unlimited access to taxpayers' funds to defend themselves, then the matter of liability and compensation for the injury caused by the population-wide application of the mRNA genetic injectables can only be resolved politically - and not through the court system.
In short, political action is the only real way forward. It can be done, but it may take decades (beyond my lifetime) – but the average Australian will need to be woken up as to how poorly we are served by our political and governance systems. Amongst other things, the Australian constitution doesn’t even give us the explicit right to free speech, let alone religious belief, as it was framed in an era when it was assumed that ‘British justice’ would go on forever.
Long term political action to redress embedded wrongs has worked in other Western countries, but it will need both commitment and organisation to bring it about, and it will require the average Australian to wake up and forgo the traditional “she’ll be right mate” frame of mind. That belonged to another era and was finally killed by the toxicity of the mRNA genetic injectables, which have without doubt degraded the long-term health outcomes of everyone who was injected. Don’t expect our equally degraded corporate & government media to take up this challenge – they don’t owe their allegiance to ordinary Australians.
In the short-term there is the distressing matter of Dr McCann’s financial situation. That needs to be addressed. Everyone who cares about this matter needs to put their hand in their pockets.
In the meantime, be assured that there is a way forward, but it will take time and active political commitment by ordinary Australians to change a rotten system.
Did this lawsuit address the serious matter of violation of valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination?
I haven’t seen the Statement of Claim, Elizabeth, so I can’t answer your question. However, since the start of the Covid crisis, I have assumed that there is nothing enshrined in Australian law that explicitly gives us the right to ‘Informed Consent’. In other words, the Nuremberg Code was never incorporated into Australian law - possibly because in the post-WW2 victory euphoria it seemed to be just common sense and nobody gave a second thought to formalising the Code - until the manufactured Covid crisis was thrust upon us. I did read on someone’s Substack recently that at least one state in Australia has legislated that that state now has the power to force a person to accept medical treatment - namely an injectable substance. I think it was Western Australia. In other words, they have done the very opposite that the Nuremberg Code intended by legislating to impose a fascist requirement of the German Third Reich. Is there anybody reading this who can provide further detail as to how and when this Australian state did this? It needs to be blazoned across every billboard in the country.
Lapun Ozymandias...I feel like I'm screaming into an abyss...
In a 'free country' obviously it is presumed people have full autonomy over their own body...
So are we not living in a 'free country'?
As I have now shared many, many, many, MANY times...
The Australian Government confirmed in a letter to my colleague Emma McArthur, in December 2021: "...informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations."
Is there anything that is not clear about that sentence? What do you think it means? Is there any ambiguity?
Also, the same letter confirms that vaccinating practitioners DO NOT have specific liability protection for administering the COVID-19 injections, only a vaccine claims scheme was put in place, and that is not the same as giving vaccinating practitioners blanket protection.
The letter also refers to The Australian Immunisation Handbook, saying it "has information about 'valid consent', including criteria for consent to be legally valid". Looking at The Australian Immunisation Handbook, this information includes the key points: "For consent to be legally valid, the following elements must be present:... It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation... It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options have been explained to the person."
What do you think Lapun O, is that not clear?
Seriously!!!
I have been banging on about this now for LITERALLY YEARS!
I've brought it to the attention of the medical colleges such as the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians; plus the Australian Medical Association, and the Australian Medical Professionals' Society; and medical insurers, and AHPRA, and the prime minister and health minister and attorney general, and other politicians, and the chief medical officer, and other bureaucrats. Plus it's been provided to a variety of doctors in the community.
And here we are, still none of these people paying a blind bit of notice or addressing the travesty of mandatory vaccination being imposed across the community.
Emma received her letter from the government in December 2021...at the very same time vaccine mandates were in place!!!! And yet it's impossible to obtain 'valid consent' from someone who is under duress to submit to a medical intervention, e.g. they are under threat of losing their job and/or participation in society.
Literally years this has been going on, and no-one will address it...
I also have a similar letter from the Australian Government dated 17 November 2022.
And it's all written up in my 11,000 word paper: Misfeasance in Public Office? The Destruction of Voluntary Informed Consent for Vaccination, June 2024: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/misfeasance-in-public-office-the-destruction-of-voluntary-informed-consent-for-vaccination.pdf
This has been raised on so many substack articles, and no interest taken...
What do you think Alison Bevege? Any interest in the valid voluntary informed consent angle?
The judge has no confidence ....spare me ....after 5 years of the bureacratic lies , the blatant corruption and malfeasance , the government's continuing to turn away from every single fact or piece of science that might incrimminate them or their public servant cronies....it's we the public , that have no confidence .....for those expecting to find justice in this system ....forget it ....this is a global problem and it's way bigger than most can comprehend ....!🙏
BigPharma has long arms
Excellent work. Sad subject. Frustrating in the extreme, the whole damn thing. So more than likely all the perpetrators and the guilty will get away with what in my view was outrageous misconduct, while our elected representatives look the other way.
A MILITARY attack against civilians conducted under emergency MILITARY powers at a time when the civilian constitution and all civilian law is SUSPENDED, can never (ever ever ever) be prosecuted in a civilian court.
There is a reason Nuremberg was a MILITARY tribunal!
I hope someone launches a Criminal Negligence trial based on the fact that Australians knew all the early warning signals and planned for AstraZeneca "expected deaths" in a conspiracy between the Australian Bureau of Statistics and the WHO.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/albo-does-not-want-you-to-see-this
Criminal Negligence DOESN'T EXIST when ALL civilian law is suspended (chief amongst it the constitution) and everything is done under "emergency powers" which literally allow ANYTHING to be done.
There is no legal remedy possible under the civilian legal system. Only MILITARY tribunals for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
"MILITARY" is the only term to talk about. Anything else is a distraction and misdirection.
Australia was under MARTIAL LAW (and still is when it comes to "public health"). The civilian legal system simply does not apply!
https://substack.com/@michaelginsburg/note/c-77688061
https://democracymanifest.substack.com/p/it-was-a-military-operation
In fact Justice Katzmann ruled yesterday that:
"I cannot rule out the possibility that there is such a case at least against one of the respondents."
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/katzmann-throws-out-mandatory-jab
There is NO case to answer because EVERYTHING that was done (mandates, lockdowns, border closures) was PERFECTLY LEGAL under "emergency powers" which are STILL in place to this day!
The (civilian) constitution does not apply as it was lawfully SUSPENDED following the "state of emergency" declaration by the Governor-General (the highest authority across the entirety of all states and territories of the Commonwealth of Australia) which gave the federal health minister and the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) of the Commonwealth of Australia effectively UNLIMITED powers:
The MILITARY (Australian and other) is in-charge. They are not under the jurisdiction of ANY civilian court. ONLY military courts and international tribunals.
"On 18 March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 outbreak in Australia, the Governor-General declared that a human biosecurity emergency exists. The declaration gives the Minister for Health expansive powers to issue directions and set requirements in order to combat the outbreak. This is the first time these powers under the Biosecurity Act have been used…
The Minister’s powers under sections 477 and 478 of the Biosecurity Act are expansive. The powers may be used to do the following:
• set requirements to regulate or restrict the movement of persons, goods, or conveyances
• require that places be evacuated
• make directions to close premises.
The powers are not limited to these circumstances. Under the Biosecurity Act, provided that the Minister is satisfied that an action is necessary to either combat the listed human disease (in this case, COVID-19) or to implement WHO recommendations in relation to that disease, the Minister may make a direction or set a requirement to ensure that action takes place.
However, the Minister may not impose certain biosecurity obligations on an individual, such as requiring them to undergo a medical examination, requiring body samples for diagnosis, or requiring them to receive specified treatment or medication. Such measures can only be authorised under a human biosecurity control order, made by the Commonwealth Chief Medical Officer or a biosecurity officer in relation to a person who may have a listed human disease (including COVID-19).
The Commonwealth CMO may make members of the Australian Defence Force human biosecurity officers if satisfied that they have appropriate clinical expertise (section 563).
The Commonwealth CMO is required to determine, in writing, training and qualification requirements for human biosecurity officers.
Such officers can exercise various powers under the Biosecurity Act, including the making of human biosecurity control orders."
https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_departments/Parliamentary_Library/Research/FlagPost/2020/March/COVID-19_Biosecurity_Emergency_Declaration
MILITARY MILITARY MILITARY MILITARY.
No other word matters!
Michael, re your statement:
QUOTE
There is NO case to answer because EVERYTHING that was done (mandates, lockdowns, border closures) was PERFECTLY LEGAL under "emergency powers" which are STILL in place to this day!
END OF QUOTE
Can you please provide the specific evidence that mandates were "PERFECTLY LEGAL under "emergency powers" which are STILL in place to this day!"
Specifically, please provide me with the evidence that the vaccinators are protected from liability if they failed to obtain valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination.
Will do some digging for the specific receipts Elizabeth but generally speaking the injectables were under EUA (Emergency Use Authorisation) and were administered under EMERGENCY powers.
As such, these are NOT "vaccines" and thus NO informed consent is required. This was also the case in the US where the injectables were tested as "medical countermeasures" under the hospices of DoD and DARPA (which funded Moderna directly for years - https://x.com/DARPA/status/819556371213484032).
Again, NO informed consent is required as these are NOT "vaccines". This was just the 'advertising buzzword' used for the public.
I think in the case of Australia specifically, this is a very good starting point:
https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_departments/Parliamentary_Library/Research/FlagPost/2020/March/COVID-19_Biosecurity_Emergency_Declaration
https://substack.com/@michaelginsburg/note/c-107757013
I am still working on putting together all the pieces of the puzzle and if you are interested in helping, this will be greatly appreciated.
I only liked it because it gave an almost plausible reason for killing & maiming hundreds of thousands of Australians..
I don’t need to hear the word ‘military ,,military...used for what took place where I live - Australia
So ...better get it worked out cos ...there will be an RC HERE .....( we have had 2 proposals for them in 2-3 years
One by Katie Galagher & the labor party .. then the 2024 version - scuttled by the other side of the duopoly- Albo
So.... just give me the news for my country, AUSTRALIA! I’ll soon get it to 8million voters, plus
I live in Australia- the Australian body politic made the decisions that maimed and killed Melissa McCanns patients - no one else
So ... you Americans can have your warp speed to oblivion , every year if you want it
I want a judicial system here in my country that protects me , my kids & grandkids , from the obscene over reach by AUSTRALIAN ‘ so called ‘ political services- that regulate those bodies that we know were infiltrated -
The TGA. ATAGI and the lacking of those regulations resulting in killing hundreds of thousands of our citizens .
Fullstop
We have a Federal election in 22 days time - the 2 x times RC are now in the bin , with this case also, now,
NO REFLECTION upon the very brave and heroic efforts of Dr . Melissa Mc Cann --
For me the judge in this case continued to,prove to, that the their arrogant, aloof & preposterous mantle that these pseudo public servants reside in , thereby consuming large portions of our taxes , are increasingly USELESS.
Bring on Nuremberg 2.0 ; I am a long term supporter of it ; They can hang Fauci, Gates & whomever developed this scandalous means to kill world populations ...
But I want justice for the ‘ wilful acts of those local ‘ buffoons who sought to deceive , when they so easily ran off to Queensland to form their ‘ National Cabinet ‘ ; we know it - they, and the judiciary are ‘ in on it ‘, and I want it exposed.
Les Kraft, is Les Catterwell , & Les Katt,....
Well done Melissa , Alison & your team - it’s NOT OVER yet --- the punishment of our politicians mentioned has only just begun .....
I am not American. I live in Queensland 😉
Sorry - I understand that in the US it was a military operation, but was it a military operation here? The real problem as I understand it is to get a misfeasance claim off the ground, the plaintiffs need to plead who in Australia authorised the shots - and then need to show that that individual knew either shots not safe & effective or reckless indifference - very hard to work out who did the authorising - anyone know?
Quoting from the article...
QUOTE
To prove misfeasance by Skerritt, Kelly and Hunt, the applicants would have to show they either acted outside their powers, intended to cause harm or were recklessly indifferent to the likely risk of harm - it’s not enough just to have a reasonably forseeable risk of harm, the judgement said.
END OF QUOTE
Did the lawsuit address the violation of valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination, e.g. via the implementation of widespread COVID-19 vaccination mandates?
The thing is Skerritt, Kelly and Hunt didn't personally mandate the vaccines (except maybe Hunt for aged care staff). The mandates came from the State Premiers and business CEOs. The Federal government could have objected to them though (but I guess they were "recklessly indifferent"!)
Yes, Kelly did personally mandate the vaccines.
See my paper: Misfeasance in Public Office? The Destruction of Voluntary Informed Consent for Vaccination, June 2024: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/misfeasance-in-public-office-the-destruction-of-voluntary-informed-consent-for-vaccination.pdf
Never fall for Government propaganda.
Evil knows no boundaries
I will add more, but this to begin with: I found the original VAERS report troubling, as I am sure you did too and although I'm probably regurgitating what you already know, these numbers are set in stone from the first release of the vaccines and as I understand them, for the first 6 months from their release, not only in America, but for the rest of the world as well, in a continuing spiral of injuries and deaths and now, everyone vaccinated is a Genetically Modified Trans Human with zero Human Rights according to the US Supreme Court Law of 2013, also included - I have not worked out the actual numbers involved with your predetermination that those numbers should be multiplied by 41 (x41): Contracts let to record 1,000 deaths per day in VAERS - BEFORE - vaccines were available, or released into human arms - like "How was that possible" You tell me? Contracts wording provided and with who https://christine257.substack.com/p/why-would-trump-and-then-biden-destroy The Vaccine Inside the Race to Conquer the COVID-19 Pandemic by Joe Miller (Author), Özlem Türeci (Author), Ugur Sahin (Author) - in this book, Ugur Sahin describes his vaccines as "Gene Therapy Injections" and he says they target "The Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes" and don't cure Covid at all - but why, I have absolutely no idea. BioNTech CEO Ugur Sahin says that his mRNA vaccines rolled out in January this year (2021): Link here: https://www.ibtimes.sg/fact-check-biontech-ceo-ugur-sahin-refuses-take-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-due-safety-concerns-61652 but by August 27, 2020 – The first contract, with General Dynamics, is dated August 27, 2020 had been let and the contract states that they were expecting up to 1,000 VAERS reports to be filed per day https://christine257.substack.com/p/there-were-no-covid-19-vaccines-close CDC Expected Huge Increase in VAERS Reporting of vaccines injuries and deaths. The contract states that they were expecting up to 1,000 VAERS reports to be filed per day, with up to 40% of the reports being serious in nature: According to the contract, VAERS had been receiving an annual average of 53,000 reports in recent years, so in contracting for up to 1,000 reports per day, the CDC was already anticipating that the COVID vaccines might generate nearly seven times as many reports as all other vaccines combined (a 600% increase), with a rate of serious adverse events that could be up to 8 times higher. The initial total amount specified (with options) under the contract with Eagle Health Analytics was $5,925,388.58 or $7,077,054.90 “with all options” (which presumably includes the extension of the VAERS work through July). This amount also includes the CISA project assistance. However, it does not include the increased hours in the Oct. 29 revision, nor the increase for the V-SAFE pregnancy registry work. However, I have not been able to find the contract in any Federal contracts database. Perhaps one of my readers will have better luck. How Much Did All of This Cost? The amounts paid out under the contracts with General Dynamics were redacted. But according to this site, the initial amount paid was $9.45 million, with $4.4 million added in late February, and then an additional $16.3 million tacked on in early March. In March of 2022 there was an additional $5.2 million added, though it’s not clear for what since the contract had presumably expired by then. (Best guess is that General Dynamics continued some or all of its work on COVID VAERS reports with Eagle Health brought in for additional support.) Grand total? $35,425,642 of your taxpayer dollars.Military Revealed as Top Funder of Gene Drives; Gates Foundation paid $1.6 million to influence UN on gene drives 2016 December 4, 2017 https://christine257.substack.com/p/there-were-no-covid-19-vaccines-close?utm_source=%2Fsearch%2Fgeneral%2520dynamics&utm_medium=reader2 According to my mathematics - all in the first 6 months, from the Covid vaccines injections and some clever mathmetician said that to get current numbers the VAERS reported numbers, had to be multiplied by 41 (x41) to get current vaccines damages correct numbers. As above - do you think the covid vaccines were safe? It was Jessica Rose that came up with the number 41. https://secularheretic.substack.com/p/death-by-covid-jabs-update-12 WASHINGTON, D.C. — Over 1,200 emails released under open records requests reveal that the U.S. military is now the top funder and influencer behind a controversial genetic extinction technology known as “gene drives” – pumping $100 million into the field. The trove of emails, obtained via open records requests, also shed light on a $1.6 million dollar UN gene drive advocacy operation paid for by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. https://christine257.substack.com/p/military-revealed-as-top-funder-of Dr. Peter Kotlár, a Slovak physician, government commissioner, and MP drops bombshell investigation into DNA Contamination. The vaccinated are now officially GMO!! "I’m not afraid to say officially— a genetically modified organism. " Robert Kennedy Jr, Pam Bondi and Kash Patel has also been informed. Moderna's Covid-19 virus formula Patented 2013 - #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG The US Supreme Court 2013 ruled that only cDNA (Synthetic DNA) is patentable. Isolated, natural DNA is not patentable, but in a nutshell, biotechnology companies can own living things if said things are genetically-modified and not naturally occurring - that means that The Department Of Defense (and others) can literally own a human being if this synthetic code is taken up into your Genome, which a Swedish Company observed to occur within 6 hours from Covid-19 Gene Therapy "vaccines" Injections. Dr Madej wrote The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your "genetic code" making you genetically modified, but Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that 1) The shots change your genetic code. 2) The shots do not stop the spread of Covid-19. 3) Tal Zaks says the Moderna shot is "hacking the software of life" and that Carbon Particles and Viral Vectors do the same thing. A vaccinated person is now legally, a "Trans Human" - A Trans Human is a new species which never existed before and by Law, they have Zero Human rights, because they are no longer Human and thus, because no Rights have ever been written into Law for them, they now have Zero rights - but much like the American Slaves up to 1865, when President Lincoln wrote into Law, Rights for them. Gene Therapy is not reversable, but now described as a forced medical treatment, which Biontech/Pfizer said "should have been licensed as a Gene Therapy Injection (2015)" and which "Targets the Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes (2023)" - but why? Thomas Renz, Lawyer, identified the vaccines as being ModRNA and not mRNA Dr Francis Boyle, the Harvard educated Law Professor who drafted the Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act of 1989, provided an Affidavit that Covid-19 mRNA injections are Biological Weapons and Weapons of Mass Destruction. Dr Boyle stated that the Covid-19 injections violate Biological Weapons 18 USC 175 and Weapons and Firearms 790.166 Fla. Stat (2023). The Expose, back in 2019 published that DARPA Scientists were bragging on Twitter that they had made the Covid-19 virus with Moderna - which Moderna went on to Patent in 2013: From that patent for Moderna's Covid-19 virus: #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
As above - the biggest problems that I see is that no Laws have been broken and everyone volunteered to be vaccinated and the Law is specific on that point, when you volunteer to do something, you are legally liable for whatever the result of that voluntary decision might be, however: The “Vaccines” Do Not Contain messenger RNA They Contain modified RNA and Micro RNA
“It is my opinion that, at a minimum, the intentional use of mRNA—an acronym well-known to stand for messenger RNA along with the endless statements about the vaccines being based on naturally occurring messenger RNA constitute misbranding in violation of a number of laws. There is a legal and moral duty to provide informed consent, and to misrepresent a drug that was intended to be a gene therapy as a vaccine containing “natural messenger RNA” is an apparent violation of both of those duties.” Thomas Renz (Ohio-based attorney)
https://christine257.substack.com/p/the-vaccines-do-not-contain-messenger
mRNA = modRNA = fact lab-created hybrids known as modRNA
massive unintended consequences in the 3300 billion lines of genetic code that make up humanity.
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Utilizes Nucleoside-Modified Messenger RNA (modRNA) Technology not mRNA, Pfizer Documents Reveal
by Jim H?ft Aug. 20, 2023 8:20 pm258 Comments
Vials of the COVID-19 vaccine are seen at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Md., Dec. 14, 2020.
Lawyer Tom Renz has exposed that the COVID-19 vaccines, widely advertised as mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines, are in fact lab-created hybrids known as modRNA.
https://christine257.substack.com/p/massive-unintended-consequences-in
BREAKING – UK Medicine Regulator confirms COVID-19 is Man-made & the Vaccines were created using Computer Generated DNA By The Exposé on October 30, 2022
https://christine257.substack.com/p/breaking-uk-medicine-regulator-confirms
Sep 13, 2023 - The latest vaccine for you - obsoletes all vaccines you have had.
https://christine257.substack.com/p/pfizer-xbb15-monovalent-vaccine-tested
How much Doctors got paid by big Pharma for prescribing or injecting their patients with Covid vaccines:
https://twitter.com/JackStr42679640/status/1689118790116941825
https://christine257.substack.com/p/how-much-american-doctors-got-paid/comments
U.S. Government Data Reveals a Staggering 143,233% Surge in Fatal Cancer Cases Linked to COVID Vaccinations
By The Exposé on December 8, 2023
Cancer begins when genetic changes interfere with the normal replication and replacement of cells in the body. Cells start to grow uncontrollably and may form a tumour. It is the No. 2 leading cause of death in the United States.
https://expose-news.com/2023/12/08/shocking-risein-cancer-cases-linked-to-c19-vaccinaion/
However - Ivermectin Tablets for all Cancers recommended by Mel Gibson, they clear up Cancers and make them go away in most cases including aggressive turbo cancers - should get them from your local Vet.
This probably does not help, but it is how it is: Dr. Peter Kotlár, a Slovak physician, government commissioner, and MP drops bombshell investigation into DNA Contamination. The vaccinated are now officially GMO!!
"I’m not afraid to say officially— a genetically modified organism.
" Robert Kennedy Jr, Pam Bondi and Kash Patel has also been informed.
Moderna's Covid-19 virus formula Patented 2013 - #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
The US Supreme Court 2013 ruled that only cDNA (Synthetic DNA) is patentable. Isolated, natural DNA is not patentable, but in a nutshell, biotechnology companies can own living things if said things are genetically-modified and not naturally occurring - that means that The Department Of Defense (and others) can literally own a human being if this synthetic code is taken up into your Genome, which a Swedish Company observed to occur within 6 hours from Covid-19 Gene Therapy "vaccines" Injections.
Dr Madej wrote The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your "genetic code" making you genetically modified, but Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that 1) The shots change your genetic code. 2) The shots do not stop the spread of Covid-19. 3) Tal Zaks says the Moderna shot is "hacking the software of life" and that Carbon Particles and Viral Vectors do the same thing. A vaccinated person is now legally, a "Trans Human" -
A Trans Human is a new species which never existed before and by Law, they have Zero Human rights, because they are no longer Human and thus, because no Rights have ever been written into Law for them, they now have Zero rights - but much like the American Slaves up to 1865, when President Lincoln wrote into Law, Rights for them.
Gene Therapy is not reversable, but now described as a forced medical treatment, which Biontech/Pfizer said "should have been licensed as a Gene Therapy Injection (2015)" and which "Targets the Dentric Cells in the Lymph Nodes (2023)" - but why?
Thomas Renz, Lawyer, identified the vaccines as being ModRNA and not mRNA
Dr Francis Boyle, the Harvard educated Law Professor who drafted the Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act of 1989, provided an Affidavit that Covid-19 mRNA injections are Biological Weapons and Weapons of Mass Destruction.
Dr Boyle stated that the Covid-19 injections violate Biological Weapons 18 USC 175 and Weapons and Firearms 790.166 Fla. Stat (2023).
The Expose, back in 2019 published that DARPA Scientists were bragging on Twitter that they had made the Covid-19 virus with Moderna - which Moderna went on to Patent in 2013: From that patent for Moderna's Covid-19 virus: #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
May 17 2024 (Reuters) - Moderna (MRNA.O) said on Friday the European Patent Office had upheld the validity of one of the company's key patents #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG , a win in an ongoing COVID-19 vaccine dispute with Pfizer (PFE.N) and BioNTech (22UAy.DE)
The company has been locked in a legal battle with Pfizer-BioNTech over their COVID shot Comirnaty after suing them in 2022 for allegedly copying its mRNA technology, but presumably #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG.
Pfizer and BioNTech have countersued, alleging that Moderna's patent is invalid, after the companies' rival vaccines generated billions in revenues during the pandemic.
Pfizer said it was disappointed and would consider all legal options and may appeal the decision.
"Irrespective of the outcome of this legal matter, we will continue to manufacture and supply the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine," Pfizer said in a statement to Reuters.
BioNTech said the patent office's decision to maintain Moderna's European patent #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG "does not change our unwavering and unequivocal stance that this patent is invalid."
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/moderna-wins-case-patent-dispute-with-pfizer-biontech-over-covid-shot-ft-reports-2024-05-17/
Could Moderna have created their vaccine, or Biontech for Pfizer their vaccines, without the Moderna Key Patent #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG Covid-19 virus, Moderna patented in 2013, the same year that The US Supreme Court 2013 ruled that only cDNA (Synthetic DNA) is patentable?
Ugur Sahin Co-founder and CEO of BioNTech refuses to take the mRNA Covid vaccine because he says, “we need to ensure functionality of our whole company”
Ugur Sahin refuses to take the jab because he says he must ensure he stays "functional," in other words, he knows that the clot shot renders humans functionless, incapacitated, and seriously injured where they cannot do their job, take care of themselves, or function for their children anymore - or kill them.
By S.D. Wells // Jan 08, 2025
Pandemic.news, GatewayPundit.com, NaturalNews.com, NewsTarget contributed.
Mandatory vaccination is illegal under Australian Law and would be subject to Legal Proceedings under Common Law against Section 51 of the Legal Code.
The Constitution prohibits any form of compulsion, which would subject citizens to medical or pharmaceutical services, including manadatory vaccination. They should remain free to decide whether they wish to receive certain medical treatments, including vaccination and they should not be disadvantaged by any government on the ground of their own voluntary decisions. - as an example of what should be standard everywhere.
The vaccines drive was a military operation. Trump in America released the Covid vaccines under his Operation Warp Speed, AUKUS released the vaccines for Australia, England and probably New Zealand and The World Health Organization released their vaccines for Europe, China had a version of Pfizer's vaccines which they released at the same time and Russia had its own vaccine which they released at the same time too. Biden sent freebies to countries which could not afford to buy them, so the Covid vaccines spread was deliberate and World Wide and all at roughly the same time - not just in your Australia and this is what started it - the Covid-19 virus Patent formula in 2013 which you can see Moderna owns - conveniently created at the same time roughly as The US Supreme Court Law above was passed: The Chinese made Covid-19 and released it on the World - Yes, Right - not one Chinese name on the patents for Moderna's Covid-19 virus in 2013
Basically it is irrefutable proof that Moderna created the Covid-19 virus and here are the Patents for it: ModernaGate: Moderna wins Award for Deadly Covid Vaccine it was able to create prior to 2019 because “Murderna” is responsible for creating the Covid-19 Virus in a BioLab… #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG By The Exposé on April 30, 2023
https://christine257.substack.com/p/cctcggcgggcacgt
Moderna's Covid-19 virus #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG may evade vaccines or the protection of natural immunity. CDC
Moderna was part of the planning and implementation of covid-19, gain-of-function experimentation, and vaccine profiteering. Here are the patents:
US9149506B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding septin-4 – 2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc.
Inventor: Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles
US9216205B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding granulysin – 2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc.
US9255129B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding SIAH E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 – 2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc.
US9301993B2: Modified polynucleotides encoding apoptosis inducing factor 1 – 2013-12-16 Application filed by Moderna Therapeutics Inc.
US9587003B2: Modified polynucleotides for the production of oncology-related proteins and peptides – 2016-02-04 Application filed by ModernaTx Inc.
Inventor: Stephane Bancel, Tirtha Chakraborty, Antonin de Fougerolles, Sayda M. Elbashir, Matthias John, Atanu Roy, Susan Whoriskey, Kristy M. Wood, Paul Hatala, Jason P. Schrum, Kenechi Ejebe, Jeff Lynn Ellsworth, Justin Guild
Learn more about this bombshell SARS-CoV-2 laboratory origin evidence at The Expose.
https://christine257.substack.com/p/moderna-patented-a-19-nucleotide
"if" mRNA DNA, which is natural to all life forms and by US Supreme Court Law can't be Patented opens the door to Heaven - what door does the Synthetic made in a Laboratory Patented ModRNA DNA open after death? - a death none of us can escape?
I refused and lost my job for 3 months so they weren’t voluntary don’t now what planet you live on
I refused, but it was probably easier for me because I am on a pension and at the very bottom of the income bracket, where I don't matter any more - same age as Trump 78. So far, my pension has not been used as a means to control my refusal - but I'd rather die than be Covid vaccinated, because I want my mRNA spirit to go to Heaven and not to wherever the ModRNA DNA, made in a laboratory and synthetic unnatural DNA lot go after death. I live on the same planet as you, it is a big planet fortunately and getting emptier, post vaccines, daily now.
So the lying, thieving, murderers will get away afterall!
Perhaps cases are being undertaken on the wrong basis Matilda...?
Sorry this judge needs
To be beside them in jail
What did anyone expect with an Aschenazi Judge, most likely part of the Criminocracy Network
Justice cost's ,,hundreds millions,,...strange ,but true.
I took the reference to "fresh eyes and a fresh start" to raise the possibility that Justice Katzmann, who is no longer taking on new cases and wants to retire this year, might be hinting that another Federal Court judge takes it on?
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/katzmann-throws-out-mandatory-jab
It is not the vaccine injured’s fault if her honour Katzman is just plain DUMB and STUPID. So dumb she says she cannot understand the language in the brief. Well dummy, take a crash course on medical terminology and vaccine injuries, just like all of those who were injured had to do! WHYTF should they get their case thrown out when their lives are now ruined, because you really don’t have the intelligence required to hold the position you do? Step down and let a REAL JUDGE with actual intelligence try the case and while you are at it, make sure they are not woke, biased and left leaning like you obviously are.
HANG YOUR HEAD IN SHAME Katzman because while you are dicking around these poor injured people and the families of those who died, please realise people are still trusting this fraudulent medical system and lining up for more of these deadly and totally ineffective so called vaccines! AND THAT FRESH BLOOD WILL BE ON YOUR HANDS!!!
ANGRY BEYOND WORDS THAT THIS CASE WAS GIVEN TO AN INCOMPETENT!!!
The judgement was quite clear and logical, despite the compelling stories involved and obvious malfeasance by government and big pharma and media. The problem is you have a set of laws and a government bureaucracy designed to shield people from responsibility. Only political action can take it down and rebuild it.
There are no “real judges”.
To my mind, this goes to show that the TGA Act (1989) & all the other Acts since about 1986 (Australia Act), were designed to establish an administrative state & regulatory framework that i) protected industry/corporate interests & targeted competitors & ii) made a shield for them & the bureaucrats so they couldn't easily be held to account.
Given what we have seen with the other so called regulators, this seems obvious in hindsight.
From what I've witnessed, the legal teams for the plaintiffs in a variety of cases over the last 5 years, haven't been able to touch the intelligence of the Government Solicitors. Although I applaud all attempts trying to get some justice, consider why do the applicants have to have a 'statement of claim'? One who makes the claim has to prove it. The government were the ones who made claims re the 'safe & effective', why can't applicants challenge the logic & reasons behind those claims in a court of law? Have the laws been written or amendment to make such a thing virtually impossible? Like legal minds need to come together to really think everything through. And that goes for some contending our 'laws' are illegal or counterfeit & not based on the original Constitution.