TGA boss makes astonishing claim that covid gene-vaccines can prevent transmission
TGA boss makes astonishing claim that covid gene-vaccines can prevent transmission
After almost every Australian caught covid despite being injected multiple times the TGA is still claiming the impossible. Even Pfizer said it didn't test for transmission
An official from Australia’s drug regulator has told a Senate inquiry that covid gene-vaccines can stop transmission, in total contradiction of reality.
In astonishing testimony to the Education and Employment Legislation Committee inquiry on August 3, TGA Medicines Regulation Division Medical Officer Andrew Pengilley said there was “an abundance of evidence” that the gene-vaccines can stop people catching covid.
The gobsmacking reply came after Senator Matt Canavan asked the Therapeutic Goods Aministration (TGA) representatives if Pfizer, Moderna or AstraZeneca had provided any evidence about the effectiveness of their gene-vaccines in reducing or stopping transmission.
In response, Dr Pengilley said:
“You can look at it as the effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing somebody getting COVID; if you do that, then you've prevented transmission to that person. Both in the clinical studies that have been submitted for registration and moreover in the literature now, there is an abundance of evidence that vaccination has the ability to prevent people from acquiring an infection of COVID however that is defined.”
Dr Pengilley went on to say studies had been done to show the gene-vaccines had reduced the spread of covid “in households, in prison communities, in healthcare facilities”.
Senator Canavan asked him to provide these studies on notice (by August 17).
Throughout the pandemic there have been competing studies claiming different - sometimes opposite - things.
We have to work out which studies describe objective reality and which are outdated, irrelevant, flawed or disproven by reality.
If reality doesn’t fit your study, your study is wrong. It doesn’t matter how many studies tell you something works, if it doesn’t work.
Australia has had covid. Most people had it more than once, after being injected multiple times with gene-vaccines that cause heart damage, blood clots and strokes. And they were only provisionally registered.
There was a study published in Nature Medicine in January on prison covid - perhaps Dr Pengilley will table it by August 17.
It found that both unvaccinated people who had covid before together with gene-vaccinated people remained highly infectious when infected with covid again.
No benefit to the gene-vaccine.
But people who had never been recorded as infected or gene-vaccinated were even more infectious when they caught covid for the first time.
So - who cares?
There are almost no people in Australia that have never been infected or injected, and even if there were, a slight reduction to “highly infectious” makes no difference.
Other studies plus real-world data show the more shots you get, the more covid you get. This is true around the world.
Here is some evidence from the UK Health Security Agency’s COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report from 2022 that you might not have seen. I like it because it shows clearly how the gene-vaccines increase (not decrease) your risk of covid a month after injection. And it’s raw figures which are not messed with.
It’s not an anomaly. Every surveillance report in early 2022 showed the exact same thing: Weeks 9, 10, 11, 12, 13. See for yourself.
They tried to pretend with increasingly desperate cautions on every table that this was not evidence that the gene-vax was useless. They tried to blame it on behaviour. Eventually the UK HSA was so embarrassed that they simply stopped printing this table. In Week 14 (April 2022) it disappeared. They hid the figures rather than admit they were wrong.
That is what bureaucracies do, because if they admit they are wrong there might be consequences: powerful people might lose their careers.
Australia never published clear figures like this on transmission and gene-vaccine status. For a year the Department of Health and Aged Care has refused to release the excess mortality stratified by age and gene-vaccine status, and now the Australian Bureau of Statistics is disappearing the excess mortality from 2022.
It’s not even possible to stop transmission like this
It is not possible for an injected gene-vaccine to stop you catching or spreading covid because it can’t stimulate your mucosal immunity.
That is why Pfizer never bothered testing whether it could stop transmission before release - they already knew.
This is explained by emeritus Professor of Immunology Robert Clancy AM (video below).
Covid is spread by aerosol transmission - through the air. It enters your body through your mucosa: the lining of your nose and mouth, your upper airways and around your eyes.
Mucosal immunity is what removes the viral load in your nose and upper airways so you don’t cough it into the air and spread it to others. Mucosal immunity is what stops the virus where it infects you.
A vaccine could only stop you catching and spreading covid if it taught your mucosal immunity to fight it.
An intramuscular injection doesn’t reach your mucosa. It can’t teach your mucosa anything.
Permanent Canberra can’t admit anyone was wrong
Dr Pengilley co-wrote an article in 2018 with Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly on government intervention in obesity.
Paul Kelly was Australia’s Chief Medical Officer in 2021 when the policy was set to coerce Australians to inject covid gene-vaccines which were only provisionally registered.
Paul Kelly in turn worked with Allen C Cheng, from ATAGI, on a paper on influenza epidemiology.
ATAGI is the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation which monitors vaccine safety issues and made the recommendations on covid gene-vaccine policy.
Epidemiology professor Allen C Cheng co-wrote a paper on influenza published in 2020 with Nigel W. Crawford (ATAGI co-chair in 2021, now chair, and senior advisor to the Victorian Health Department vaccine team in 2020-21), Jim P. Buttery (Advisory Committee on Vaccines), Kristine Macartney (Advisory Committee on Vaccines), Christopher C Blythe (ATAGI co-chair 2021), and Paul Kelly (Australia’s Chief Medical Officer from 2020 to present).
This connectedness shows Permanent Canberra consists of a milieu of public health bureaucrats who work together, collaborate together, and share ideas and goals.
These are the people who informed and enabled the policy of coercing experimental gene-vaccines on the Australian population.
This milieu is a recipe for group-think, peer pressure and not challenging orthodox thinking once it is entrenched in departmental culture.
People don’t want to hurt the careers of their colleagues by calling out their mistakes, especially when they are interdependent for career progression.
Epidemiology professor Allen C Cheng co-wrote this ATAGI statement on immunisation in 2022, along with Kristine Macartney, Christopher Blyth and Nigel Crawford, which claimed:
“The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) provisionally registered four COVID-19 vaccines for use in Australia in 2021 (Table 2).14 These vaccines were rigorously evaluated for safety and effectiveness before they were provisionally registered and provided to Australians for free through the national COVID-19 vaccination program.”
This is not true.
The TGA’s provisional registration process does not rigorously evaluate products for safety and effectiveness before registration.
That’s the entire point of provisional registration. Speed not thoroughness.
You can have it quick and dirty, or slow and meticulous - but you can’t have both.
Provisional registration was introduced in 2018 to allow products to be sold to consumers quickly, before all the testing required for full registration is complete.
Clinical data is submitted “on a rolling basis” as people are already taking the products. The TGA says this clearly on its website.
This was lobbied for by Medicines Australia, acting for the big pharmaceutical companies who want more patent-time on market to maximise profits.
The new law was passed under the guise of letting terminally ill patients have access to last-ditch experimental medicines that might save their lives.
This is what then-Health Minister Greg Hunt said in 2017 on introducing the second reading of the Bill to parliament:
“This would allow Australian patients with currently inadequate treatment options to access potentially life-saving or life-transforming medicines up to two years earlier than under the current framework. It builds on similar approaches available to patients in Europe and North America.
Such medicines would be registered on the basis of early clinical data which provides promising evidence that the medicine is likely to be a major therapeutic advance for Australian patients.”
Provisional registration was not meant to allow healthy young people to be injected with an experimental gene-vaccine with unknown long-term consequences.
But that is exactly what it was used for in 2021.
These products were not rigorously evaluated because if they had been, then ATAGI and the TGA would have known they could not stop transmission and that they were not safe.
The danger of never asking: could we be wrong?
Permanent Canberra had already made up their minds that the gene-vaccines were “safe and effective” in November 2020 - based on no evidence at all because even the preliminary trials had not yet finished.
This is revealed by the government’s covid vaccination policy.
Page 17 reveals the communications strategy was already worked out:
“Key messages include:
A COVID-19 vaccine is the best way to protect the Australian community '
Our goal is early access to, and delivery, of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines and treatments for all Australians
We continue to follow our rigorous regulatory procedures in Australia to ensure that vaccine candidates are effective and safe for use”
Sound familiar? They decided they would tell you this before they knew if the product was safe or not, in November 2020.
This is because the government had already bought the Pfizer gene-vaccine, already signed the agreements before testing had finished.
The policy notes on page 9 that it was “one of nine vaccines supported by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, a global partnership to accelerate vaccine development.”
The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) has long been chaired by Jane Halton, a Permanent Canberra kingpin who was formerly Secretary of the Department of Health as well as the Department of Finance.
CEPI states on its website that its goal is to develop 100-day vaccines. There’s not much time for safety testing in 100 days. Provisional registration plus a pre-approved mRNA platform is needed to ram through such a product.
CEPI is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Wellcome Trust, two pharmaceutical lobby groups disguised as charities for tax and PR purposes.
Jane Halton was also the principal reviewer in the influential Review of COVID-19 Vaccine and Treatment Purchasing and Procurement, released to Health Minister Mark Butler on 19 September 2022.
The problem Permanent Canberra and CEPI have is that it’s now obvious that the mRNA platform isn’t safe, and the gene-vaccines never could stop transmission.
There never was a reason to mandate them - but if they’re not coerced then there might be no building two big mRNA factories in Melbourne and Brisbane, which Moderna and Sanofi are involved in.
That would not please CEPI. Everyone would have egg on their faces if Permanent Canberra admitted they were wrong.
So they’re in a pickle.
Permanent Canberra’s departments appear to be adjusting the figures so the safety problems can’t be seen.
That way nobody has to admit they were wrong and everyone can move on to their next promotion, rotate around the departments and get their Order of Australia.
Instead, as Australia’s six honest Senators have demanded, we must have a Royal Commission and Parliament must repeal the 2017 legislation that created provisional registration.
At the root of this problem is the commitment and consistency bias, a known flaw in human psychology.
Permanent Canberra’s departmental culture was only prepared for one conclusion because by November 2020, they had already made up their minds that the gene-vaccine would be “safe and effective”.
They clearly regarded the medical trials as mere formalities run by big competent corporations that would produce the answer they were banking on. It’s written in their policy document. We never stood a chance of changing their minds.
Imagine the level of naivety you would have to have, to take pharmaceutical industry giants convicted of criminal fraud at their word and to buy their products sight unseen.
Psychology expert and investment king Charlie Munger spoke about the dangers of commitment and consistency bias in his celebrated lecture to Harvard University: “The psychology of human misjudgement”.
“The human mind is a lot like the human egg,” he said.
“And the human egg has a shut-off device. When one sperm gets in, it shuts down so the next one can’t get in. The human mind has a big tendency of the same sort. And here again, it doesn’t just catch ordinary mortals, it catches the deans of physics.”
Please note: the term “gene-vaccine” is both accurate and necessary to distinguish these products from ordinary vaccines. Unlike ordinary vaccines, these products instruct cells to produce non-human spike proteins using a genetic sequence from the sars-cov-2 virus. This term does not make reference to interference with DNA.
Ladies and Gentleman please fasten your seatbelts.
We are rapidly approaching the clownworld singularity, where the lies are so fantastical that you have to have a brain made of dark matter to believe them.
The trusted authorities the public voted for told them it was a vaccine. The public believed it was a vaccination like any other vaccine. This is about the depth of public critical thinking. It seems less and less likely anyone will seriously held to account that we few who question know.