'HALT the vax': Dr John Campbell joins the calls to investigate the mRNA products after injuries, deaths; Dr Kerryn Phelps cracks Australia's wall of silence
Historically vaccines have been suspended for serious reactions in just 1 in 100,000 cases, but re-analysis of the trial data shows the mRNA danger is 1 in every 800 shots
UK’s Dr John Campbell joins the calls to halt the mRNA products
Risk of serious adverse events is 1 in 800, re-analysis of trial data shows
Other vaccines have been recalled for serious reactions of only 1 in 100,000
Australia’s Dr Kerryn Phelps reveals doctors were silenced by medical boards
Thought control falling apart after Elon Musk's Twitter revelations
Former Australian Medical Association head Dr Kerryn Phelps has revealed that Australia’s professional boards stopped doctors from acknowledging mRNA problems, while respected British academic Dr John Campbell has called for a covid vaccine pause.
Dr Campbell had to turn to Rumble to make his announcement, despite years of dedicated YouTube postings because of censorship.
Dr Campbell, a UK-based nurse educator with 2.6 million YouTube subscribers, has joined a host of international experts calling for an investigation.
They include UK cardiologist Aseem Malhotra, US cardiologist Peter McCullough (touring Australia in February), mRNA inventor Robert Malone, and the UK-based HART goup co-chaired by pathologist Clare Craig.
Dr Aseem Malhotra has said severe adverse reactions are running at a rate of one in 800, a figure which is based on a peer-reviewed re-evaluation of the original mRNA trial data.
The Paul Ehrlich Institute, the vaccine authority for Germany, said in its May Safety Report that 1 in 5000 mRNA injections resulted in a severe adverse event - which means life-changing (eg: stroke, paralysis, death, heart failure). When people have multiple shots the risk increases.
Either way, it’s an extremely high risk compared to historical vaccines which have been suspended for far less.
In 1998 the US Centers for Disease Control recommended suspending the rotavirus vaccine RotaShield after it increased the risk of a rare bowel obstruction called intussusception, causing healthy infants to suffer at a rate of 1 to 2 per 10,000. The manufacturer withdrew it in 1999.
Letters From Australia asked the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) earlier this month if it would now consider suspending the mRNA injectables.
A TGA spokesperson said via email that individual clinical studies must be considered in the context of their limitations and the broader body of evidence.
“The benefits of COVID-19 vaccines continue to far outweigh the potential risks with serious side effects being very rare,” the spokesperson said.
Many injured people have complained online that doctors would not consider the injections being the cause of their symptoms.
Doctors themselves reported fear of being labelled “anti-vaxxer” and of having regulatory action taken against them by Australia’s medical boards if they spoke up.
Respected Australian doctor and former MP Dr Kerryn Phelps broke the censorship last week by revealing both she and her wife had been injured by the mRNA product.
Her story was widely shared by corporate media, in what might be the first serious crack in the corporate-state mRNA propaganda.
Australia’s health professionals were censored in March 2021 as the mRNA products were first rolled out.
They were forced to take the product themselves, and those who refused lost their jobs.
The regulatory boards told them not to say anything against the mRNA or face disciplinary action and de-registration. This threatened their entire careers because without a license they’d never work again.
The Australian Health Practitioner Regulatory Agency (AHPRA) and the Medical Board of Australia issued this joint directive in March 2021 threatening punishment for any health worker who voiced concerns about the vaccine including on social media.
“There is no place for anti-vaccination messages in professional health practice, and any promotion of anti-vaccination claims including on social media, and advertising may be subject to regulatory action,” spokesman Brett Simmonds said in the statement.
Letters From Australia asked AHPRA in January 2022 whether that statement had created a culture that discouraged doctors from investigating, reporting or recognising vaccine injuries.
“Vaccination is a crucial part of the public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic,” an AHPRA spokesperson said via email at the time.
“When providing care, advice or sharing information online, registered health practitioners have a professional obligation to provide information that is evidence-based, in line with the best available health advice, and is consistent with public health messaging.”
“There is nothing in the March 2021 vaccination position statement from the National Boards that should discourage the reporting of AEFIs (adverse effects following immunisation).”
But that is not the experience of doctors.
Dr Phelps said doctors did feel censored by that AHPRA statement.
“Quite a number of doctors that I’ve spoken to have felt impeded on speaking out about their concerns about vaccine adverse events because of the statement made by AHPRA that doctors shouldn’t say anything that was going to impede the government’s vaccine rollout, and they took that to mean not to publicly raise their concerns,” she told 9 News Today Show.
Dr Phelps’ revelation prompted ABC journalist Eleni Roussos to share her own vaccine injury.
The social media censorship is still in force.
YouTube disfigured Dr Phelp’s courageous interview with a censorship banner that appears whenever any expert criticises the mRNA product.
The effect of this banner is to create doubt in the viewer about the expert regardless of evidence, and to imply that only the Government has the true facts on mRNA.
YouTube’s “medical misinformation policy” (censorship) bans data that contradicts the World Health Organisation’s edicts as per below:
This blocks frank discussion of peer-reviewed science.
Dr Campbell, an experienced nurse trainer from Britain’s NHS health service, has examined the published covid science daily since the pandemic unfolded.
But even he had difficulty reporting the peer-reviewed research that revealed mRNA injury and death because of the YouTube censorship.
Stanford University professor Jay Bhattacharya was censored by Twitter then later invited in to Twitter HQ by new owner Elon Musk to see what they had done to him.
YouTube had also censored Dr Bhattacharya after he took part in a March 2021 public roundtable discussion organised by Florida governor Ron DeSantis, and went against the official narrative on facemasks by pointing out there were no randomised studies suggesting they worked.
“The public was denied an opportunity to hear all sides of the scientific debate going on and because of these actions the public was misinformed,” Dr Bhattacharya told UnHerd in an interview uploaded December 16.
YouTube is owned by Alphabet Inc, which also owns Google.
Google’s search engine, relied on by journalists, has been caught prioritising search results that smeared respected Canadian vaccinologist Dr Byram Bridle, who raised questions about mRNA myocarditis risk in early 2021.
Dr Bridle also called for a moratorium on the mRNA products in April, 2022.
Google promotes the mRNA product by hiding critical links and promoting positive links even when outdated or wrong, such as a Reuters news article that states the mRNA vaccine has not been found in breast milk, when it now has.
Reuters did not mention their quoted study co-author, Dr Stephanie Gaw, received grant funding from mRNA-promoting bodies National Institutes of Health and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Same owners, corporate mates: regulator, media heavyweights sit on the Pfizer board
Reuters’ chief executive and president from 2012 to 2020, James C. Smith, is also a Pfizer director and has been since 2014, alongside former US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) head Scott Gottlieb.
As of December 28, 2022, Alphabet (Google) had fund managers as the top three owners: Vanguard, BlackRock and Fidelity, according to CNN Business.
Pfizer’s top three owners are Vanguard, SSgA (State Street) and BlackRock , CNN Business reported.
Pfizer raised its forecast for 2022 sales of its heavily promoted and government enforced mRNA covid product to US$34 billion in November, Reuters reported.
Vanguard and Fidelity also both owned top ten stakes in wire news service Reuters (Thomson Reuters Corp) as of December 28, 2022, CNN reported.
When investment firms like BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street “own” top 10 stakes, they only manage their holding on behalf of their fund investors who have the “ownership”. This changes nothing. The same interconnected boards of directors have influence by controlling those large ownership stakes.
Governments ask corporations and vice versa to suppress
But it’s western “democratic” governments that have been asking, pushing, meeting with, requesting action from media and tech firms in order to push pro-mRNA propaganda.
The Biden Administration was caught pushing for former NY Times journalist Alex Berenson to be deleted from Twitter.
And who was behind this? Pfizer was.
Alex Berenson revealed on his Substack that none other than Pfizer board member Scott Gottlieb, a former head of the FDA - the US regulator of the drug industry, equivalent to Australia’s TGA - had sent an urgent email about him to a contact at Twitter, days before his account with more than 340,000 followers was banned.
It is thought that Australia is doing the same thing but there’s little chance of obtaining direct evidence or being able to publish it in legal safety even if a whistleblower did emerge.
UPDATE: 30 December 2022 - edited to include Dr Jay Bhattacharya, response from the TGA, estimates of vaccine injury rates and other general improvements
31 December 2022 - edited to add second Dr John Campbell video on the re-analysis of the mRNA trial data that shows 1 in 800 risk of serious reactions, and the context of historic vaccines that were suspended for far less. Added 2 bullet points up top, with peer-reviewed paper substantiating this, linked.
02 January 2023 - edited to update Alex Berenson pars to include revelation that Pfizer had badmouthed him to Twitter days before his ban. Also corrects error that it was the Biden administration who sought to censor Berenson and not the FBI (the FBI had manipulated Twitter in the Hunter Biden laptop case and not Berenson’s case).