The Trusted News Initiative ABC, and every other Australian newspaper, has been reporting on a group of men who congregated on Australia Day in Sydney. They wore balaclavas, got on a train, carried flags, got off a train, stood in a park, shared “anti vaccination” statements, and said racist slurs (that is seriously the extent of the information we are told).
The MSM tells us they are the Far Right group, The Nationalist Socialist Group. As an aside, the Leader of The Nationalist Socialist Group, Thomas Sewell, seems to be everywhere lately, right at a time when the Government needs to garner support for its Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation Bill.
I am in no way minimising that there are dangerous groups, bodies, corporations and governments; who harm, spread disinformation and trample human rights. I stand unequivocally against violence and misinformation intentionally being used to silo and create division; whether it’s through media, government, citizen groups, academics, unelected global bodies or corporations. Some of the groups creating division and misinformation are underground, some are front and centre controlling global narratives. My post is specifically about the narratives constructed that anyone who stands in the way of Global dictates, and dares to raise concerns about the world being transformed (with the vast majority of the population not knowing it’s even happening), is compared to groups such as The National Socialist Group, Far Right Extremists and Nazis.
The response to the men is summed up by Executive Council of Australian Jewry’s Alex Ryvchin: “This incident reminds us how fragile our social order is and the need for vigilance in the face of violent movements intent on spreading lies, hatred and fear” https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/neo-nazis-confronted-by-sydney-police-banned-from-australia-day-events-20240126-p5f0bw.html
I have somehow managed to live in Australia for 50 years and not once met a Neo Nazi, but now they are everywhere. Reds Under The Bed peril is the template for NAZI! NAZI! NAZI!. Forcing our “bewildered” governments to bring in more restrictive policing and Combatting Disinformation and Misinformation legislation.
Who is the National Socialist Group that keeps popping up for Australian media coverage? According to Wikipedia they are a Neo Nazi group who were garnering recruits through Government Covid policy protests.
What is a Far Right Extremist?
To pull apart all the words Wikipedia uses to describe Far Right Extremism would need to be book length. But suffice to say that in these times of inversion the terms are broad enough to capture anyone questioning the reasoning, vested interests, or human rights concerns regarding the way the world is being “transformed”. Doesn’t matter if you are/were Left Wing politically the minute you question certain subjects, you’re cast as Far Right and demonised.
The Global Project Against Hate and Extremism released a report on Australia naming 20 organisations/ political parties who create hate and extremism. They say:
The majority of the 20 groups listed in the report are white nationalist, anti-immigrant, or anti-Muslim, but anti-LGBTQ+, anti-transgender, antisemitic, anti-women, and groups pushing conspiracy theories also made the list. Since the COVID pandemic, protests over lockdowns and other measures have brought together various extremist groups in the same way such protests created alliances between white supremacists, militia members, and Trump supporters in the U.S. pandemic.https://globalextremism.org/post/release-australia-report/
We see a repeated linking of protests over Government Covid policies, Conspiracy Theories and Far Right Extremism.
This narrative has been created since people, around the world, first started protesting against their respective government’s Covid response. Note this article is from 2020.
In 2021 I watched the live streaming of the protests in Melbourne, the most locked down city in the world. When I read the media’s hit piece the words Far Right Extremist and Domestic Terrorist jumped off the page.
I watched the live streaming of protests outside the CFMEU Construction, Forestry, Mining, Energy Union in Melbourne. Protesters were Union members who were protesting mandatory vaccinations. Even politicians and msm can’t spin the narrative that a Union member can be a Far Right Extremist, so the story went that they were Far Right Extremists dressed as Construction Workers.
What I saw from watching hours of live footage was Union members going to the CFMEU for support, being told by CFMEU boss John Setka that he’d listen to their concerns, before he went inside and on to a radio interview where he called the protestors morons. When the protestors heard what he said they started pushing on the door, Setka and a bunch of thugs came out and started beating them up. It’s what’s called a Stitch UP. Taschi Talks discussed this here: https://rumble.com/vmsat9-taschi-talks-ep8-john-setka-dan-andrews-globalist-stooge.html
The author of this hit piece, “Anti- Terrorism Expert” Josh Roose is regularly trotted out to make links between people concerned about forced vaccination to Terrorists. Josh doesn’t believe that there are large corporate entities, or unelected bodies having undue influence over our lives. According to Josh Roose’s quote below if you are concerned about the implications of centralised power, such as private corporations working in partnership with the United Nations, you’re deluded and a Far Right Extremist. For e.g. the UN partnership with the 1000 largest corporations (WEF) in the world to speed up the UN Sdg implementation or the UN Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) partnership with CropLife (Bayer-Monsanto, Syngenta, BASF etc) to transform our food systems.
For more information on the author Josh Roose, Warren Ross has a recent article exploring Josh and his place in the Far Right Extremist narrative.
Conspiracy, Misinformation and Far Right Extremism
Misinformation is a hot topic around the world, the Labor government is trying to garner public support to legislate its Combatting Misinformation Disinformation Bill. It will be a way to shut down information that is contrary to any dictate that comes from the likes of the United Nations, for example.
Trusted News Initiative ABC (Partnership with Google, Meta, Microsoft, Reuters etc) is living up to its partnership obligations by dumbing down complex issues into a simple - Government and Private Corporation partnership dictates (Good) Vs. Those harmed by government and Private Corporation partnership decisions (bad- conspiracy theorist) paradigm. Can the photo be any more proof of how this narrative is being sensationalised?
Who else is a Far Right Extremist?
Whilst the mainstream media holds a special place in it’s heart for the “Anti Vaxxer”, Conspiracy Theorist, Right Wing Extremist hit pieces. Increasingly any group that gets in the way of the government rolling out global body plans is smeared as a Far Right Extremist (or vulnerable to being taken over by them, which is the same thing according to MSM).
Are you questioning the Climate Change modelling, the measures governments are putting in place under the guise of Net Zero, or that enormous amount of money that is going into global corporate hands? You’re a Far Right Extremist!
Are you a farmer, or do you support farmers as they protest around the world due to the government’s Net Zero policies forcing them off their farms? You’re a Far Right Extremist!
Are you a Permaculturalist or an Organic Gardener (who might stand in the way of the transformation of our food systems) You’re a Right Wing Extremist!
Are you a woman who is concerned about biological men identifying as woman being allowed in to female change rooms and prisons (even if they have not had genital surgery and they are going to jail for killing women)? You’re a Far Right Extremist!
https://nypost.com/2023/06/26/fury-as-trans-woman-who-murdered-three-is-sent-to-female-prison-after-hate-crime/
As an aside- the media will not cover the violence women are subjected to when they do protest. This video is a powerful description of this:
Where is this heading?
Calling people protesting against the system Far Right Extremists and linking them to Nazis serves to dehumanise. Once people are dehumanised the brutality of the system can descend on them without a stir, or worse people will support the violence.
Australia’s Counter Terrorism Laws
Australia’s Counter Terrorism Laws are already very broad, vague and dangerous. Australia's laws against terrorism are in Part 5.3 of the Criminal Code Act 1995. Since 9-11 Australia has passed a multitude of Anti Terrorism laws. https://theconversation.com/australia-has-enacted-82-anti-terror-laws-since-2001-but-tough-laws-alone-cant-eliminate-terrorism-123521
Within the legislation there are a number of issues which have been raised regarding human rights and the vagueness of the terms applied. https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/legal/human-rights-guide-australias-counter-terrorism-laws
For example:
A terrorist act is an "an action or threat of action" which is intended to advance a political, religious or idealogical cause and coercing or influencing by intimidation, the government.. or intimidating the public..."
And an action can be one that "creates a serious risk to public health or safety". Or threatens a person's safety.
It's fairly easy to see that the portion of Australian's who said no to an experimental substance would be seen as a threat to public safety (they blatantly said this). And it's also easy to see that an organisation which challenges the use of masks or lockdowns, could be charged as a Terrorist organisation.
But there are wider implications as every transformation from the Digital Revolution to Synthetic Food is being touted as essential for human and environmental safety, all under the UN Sdgs. And as we are now under a UN WHO One Health Model where every component of life- health, environment, animals is connected under a Biosecurity Framework anything can be pulled out as a serious risk to human safety.
Misinformation and Disinformation
The newly released WEF Global Risks Report 2024 places Misinformation and Disinformation as the number one global risk, and Societal polarisation as the third risk, which they say is due to Misinformation and Disinformation.
https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2024.pdf
Lucky for us the Australian Government (as are many governments around the world) is working hard on the Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation Bill. The 2023 public submission of the Bill drew 23,000 responses, including 3,000 submissions, many of which were critical of the bill. So the government is tweaking it before it’s introduced into Parliament. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/13/labor-misinformation-bill-objections-freedom-of-speech-religious-freedom
The Minister for Communications Michelle Rowland is quoted as saying Mis- and disinformation sows divisions within the community, undermines trust and can threaten public health and safety. And the handbook accompanying the draft legislation stated misinformation and disinformation pose a threat to the safety and wellbeing of Australians, as well as our democracy, society and economy.
The Bill is broad and vague and up to a handful of people to determine what constitutes harm:
For misinformation to be covered by the powers, it must be reasonably likely that it would cause or contribute to serious harm. For harm to be serious, it is intended that it must have severe and wide- reaching impacts on Australians.
Peter Fam from Maat’s Law submission regarding the Bill outlines that though the government sells the Bill as only applicable to Digital Services this is not accurate.
The above definitions taken in tandem mean that an individual who posts content online which is accessible to more than one other person is captured by the various powers the Bill grants ACMA. That individual (any Australian citizen who posts something online) would need to comply with any digital platform rules, or misinformation codes or standards, that ACMA implements under the Bill. That individual would also be subject to the severe civil and criminal penalties that the Bill implements if those codes/standards are breached.
Peter Faam’s full submission is here https://www.maatsmethod.com.au/post/our-submission-regarding-the-misinformation-bill.
Combatting Misinformation Disinformation Bill is here https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/communications-legislation-amendment-combatting-misinformation-and-disinformation-bill-2023-guidance-note-june2023_2.pdf
As shown through the WEF ranking Disinformation as the biggest risk over the next two years, in 2024 we are going to be hit hard and fast with propaganda to convince people that full scale censorship is imperative for democracy; they must convince us that the people themselves are dangerous, not the vested interests overtaking (any guise of) democracy. How can you implement full scale censorship and repression, under the banner of democracy if too many people are pushing back? You have to convince people to allow you take more control for the sake of democracy. And hereby we need to navigate through the era of Double Speak.
Relevant links to misinformation- disinformation - far right extremist narratives:
PART 3 of 3
What that Guardian idiot, George Monbiot, is talking about is Lysenkoism. Which was a Soviet style farming project based on socialist principles like planting crops close together to encourage cooperation. It was madness and resulted in the death of millions. It is a far away from Bill Mollison’s Permaculture principles as dumping a bottle of Roundup on a seedling. See James Lindsay on Lysenkoism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0iWzzVfxBg&t=2s
There is a battle for trust and the Trusted News Initiative is one part of a system of information and social control that was turbocharged during Covid. These people are battling for our trust by concealing truth and telling lies. The real threat is people who do “their own research”. That is why social media was so heavily policed during the 2021-2022. The extremes came off Twitter in late 2022 and off Facebook 6 months later but the censoring before that and during the critical period of Covid-19 was savage and total. There were words like Ivermectin that immediately brought you to the censors scrutiny.
So they want our trust while they lie to us. That is an ambitious project but they seem keen to take it on. Its success demands similar social media control be reimposed and government legislation to frame it. People really should know that throughout the pandemic our Department of Health was running a censorship project involving the Department of Home Affairs and Facebook. The arrangement was Health had an agency working for it that identified each Australian'sFacebook activity that contravened Facebook’s own Covid policy. When one of these breaches was recognised, Home Affairs was told who then notified Facebook (See - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2zOt1WOd_Y). This was the sort of Private Public Partnership we can expect in the future if we don’t wake up.
These people DO NOT deserve our trust. We are led by criminals.
well done this is an excellent piece. I, too, noticed the fake neo-Nazis and immediately i thought they look more like cops/asio/Antifa in fancy dress. Never met a real neo-Nazi anywhere in all my life, they just aren't a thing here, yet suddenly there are 61 of them at North Sydney Station? Bollocks. A media prop in the psychological war against any resistance to government policy. Well done this is excellent research.